Jan Morgan for Arkansas

10/03/2026

Uh oh! 😂
It's mid term elections and President Trump is RAGING MAD at Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton.

The President went on Truth Social and posted a two page rant asking Arkansas voters to do something about Cotton😉

I guess President Trump will be the next Republican receiving a pink slip from the Republican Party of Arkansas for publicly criticizing a Republican 😂

Heck, the RPA may ban Trump from the party , along with all the rest of the banned republicans in this state for exercising their first amendment rights. 😂😂

, Jan Morgan, Jan Morgan for Arkansas, Jan Morgan

09/30/2026

ARKANSAS ALERT: Your Governor and Legislature BETRAYED YOU.

While ELECTED OFFICIALS in 36 states enacted legislation PROTECTING their citizens from infrastructure costs and rate increases related to Data Centers... -
ARKANSAS elected officials passed legislation forcing YOU to pay the bill through a rate increase.

WHY did our REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR and REPUBLICAN legislature not only FAIL to protect us, but saddled us with the bill?

If you are an Entergy Arkansas customer, take a look at your electric bill.
It is a charge identified as the Generating Arkansas Jobs Act rider, or GAJA.

That charge exists EVERY MONTH on your bill because of legislation passed by the Arkansas General Assembly and signed into law by Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

In March 2025, the legislature passed Senate Bill 307, the Generating Arkansas Jobs Act, which became Act 373.

The law allows ENTERGY customers to be charged for financing costs associated with major infrastructure investments, including the $1.6 billion Arkansas Cypress solar and battery project being developed in connection with Google’s data center operations.

WHO PASSED THE LAW?
The buck stops at Sarah Huckabee Sanders desk .

She signed off on this rate increase on your electric bill on March 25th, 2025.

Senator Jonathan Dismang ( who just resigned to take a high paying job with the electric cooperatives INC ) was the lead Senate sponsor.
Representative Jon Eaves was the primary House sponsor.

The final legislative votes were:

Arkansas Senate: 23 YES, 9 NO.

Arkansas House: 77 YES, 13 NO.

In the comments , I'm NAMING NAMES. . You will see which legislators voted for this and which did not .

To Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders :
Why should Arkansas households struggling with their own electricity bills help finance infrastructure associated with some of the world's wealthiest corporations?
WHY?


Jan Morgan Jan Morgan for Arkansas Jan Morgan

09/29/2026

09/25/2026

Arkansas ALERT: VOTE NO on Issue 3!

Folks , the REPUBLICAN State Senator who was lead sponsor of the bill that RAISED YOUR ELECTRICITY was the lead sponsor of Issue 3 .

Our Republican Governor should have refused to sign it.
Instead she approved it.

With a REPUBLICAN controlled government , this REPUBLICAN led issue, approved by the REPUBLICAN Governor is CORPORATE WELFARE ripe for corruption opportunities . ( Never mind the fact that ISSUE 3 conflicts with the Republican Party Platform )

Folks, we've been down this road before and a slew of REPUBLICANS got caught lining their own pockets with kickbacks from YOUR TAX DOLLARS.

ARKANSAS ISSUE 3:
BEFORE WE HAND GOVERNMENT MORE POWER OVER PUBLIC MONEY, REMEMBER THE GENERAL IMPROVEMENT FUND SCANDAL.

Remember the General Improvement Fund (GIF)?

Taxpayer money intended for public improvements became the center of a federal corruption investigation involving legislators, lobbyists, nonprofit organizations, bribery and kickbacks.

*REPUBLICAN State Senator Jon Woods was convicted on 15 federal counts and sentenced to more than 18 years in prison.

*REPUBLICAN representative Micah Neal pleaded guilty to conspiracy and admitted receiving approximately $38,000 in bribes.

* REPUBLICAN Jeremy Hutchinson admitted accepting 350 thousand dollars in bribes for directing GIF money to a business.

DEMOCRAT Representative Henry Wilkes plead guilty to taking 95 thousand in bribes to direct 245 thousand in GIF money to his business buddies .

Federal investigators documented how approximately $600,000 in public funds was directed through the Northwest Arkansas Economic Development District to two nonprofit organizations in exchange for bribes.

This was not a hypothetical concern about government corruption.
It happened right here in Arkansas.

NOW CONSIDER WHAT ISSUE 3 WOULD AUTHORIZE.

The proposed constitutional amendment would allow the legislature to establish new economic development programs using public money for loans and grants.
( sound familiar?)

It would also authorize economic development districts with powers to:

• Issue bonds exempt from certain existing constitutional debt restrictions.

• Levy taxes, assessments and other charges on property within their boundaries.

• Receive public funding and financial support from local governments.

• Exempt property within their boundaries from ordinary property taxes, including school district property taxes, while allowing the districts to impose their own taxes and charges.

The amendment would also take precedence over conflicting constitutional provisions and judicial interpretations.

But Arkansas taxpayers have legitimate questions about how these programs would operate, who would receive the money and what protections would prevent another public funding scandal.

HERE IS MY QUESTION FOR THE LEGISLATORS WHO PUT ISSUE 3 ON THE BALLOT:

What specific safeguards would prevent public money from being directed to businesses or organizations with political connections?

Who would independently verify that recipients are legitimate, that projects are completed and that promised jobs are actually created?

Would every grant, loan, recipient and financial relationship with public officials be disclosed to the public?

What happens when a taxpayer-funded project fails?

And why are voters being asked to amend our Constitution before the legislature has enacted the detailed rules governing these new programs?

In other words, VOTERS ARE BEING ASKED TO AUTHORIZE THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK BEFORE THE FINAL IMPLEMENTING RULES HAVE BEEN ENACTED !

( sound familiar ? Nancy Pelosi saying we have to pass the bill before we can find out what's in it.)

The General Improvement Fund scandal demonstrated what can happen when public money, political influence and inadequate oversight intersect.

Issue 3 is a different proposal, and its passage would not automatically recreate the former GIF program. But the history of that scandal makes the need for enforceable accountability impossible to ignore.

Vote NO on ISSUE 3.

Because LESS Government is better government .
If you want real ECONOMIC GROWTH, you must first have ECONOMIC FREEDOM.
Free market enterprise and capitalism works when the government stays out of the way . -Jan Morgan

Jan Morgan Jan Morgan for Arkansas

09/21/2026

It’s happening in state after state and it’s coming in fast- REZONING!
Here’s what people are telling us:
1. “Developers attorney helped write the data center ordinances”
2. “Signed NDA and they rezoned this cornfield into heavy industrial”
3. “City council annexed substantial parcel of land from agricultural to industrial”
4. “Zero impact assessments which are required - it’s an agricultural zone and they rezoned it for commercial, not industrial”
5. “City let a company rezone and amend PUD for data center buildings”

We have hundreds of these. Same playbook.
Agricultural is now Industrial. No studies. No transparency. The residents are the last to know.
This is wrong. Our zoning, our land, and our process deserve better.

09/20/2026

Breaking News- Both Trump and Netanyahu abruptly cut weekend short, citing significant war escalation.