05/22/2024
In this month's issue of Planning, I write about the oversupply of retail space found in many downtown environments - one that is too frequently sanctioned by zoning requirements that either require ground-floor commercial or restrict ground-floor residential (really, the same thing). This often happens in places where there is scant market demand. Even in instances where developers express resistance to requirements that will saddle them with unproductive space, planning orthodoxy often reigns, rooted in what I consider a mischaracterization of Jane Jacob's philosophy of "eyes on the street".
So, what is the solution? First, let's acknowledge that great streets do not always need ground-floor retail, and vacant retail spaces never make for great streets. Is this really so controversial? APA seems to think so! Let me know what you think in the comments.
Rethinking ground-floor regulations to include residential uses is a controversial but doable solution to housing underproduction and a glut of empty storefronts.