08/13/2026
To be clear, I have not changed my position. I do not support moving forward with a data center or BESS facility in Linn Valley.
I am not posting this to change anyone’s mind, reopen the debate, or persuade residents to support either type of facility. I respect the conclusions people have reached.
However, I will continue to clarify statements that could create a materially misleading impression about the City—particularly its finances, decisions, or actions. Residents should be able to oppose a proposal while still receiving an accurate account of what the City did and did not do.
A recent discussion about data-center tax incentives could leave a reader with the impression that Linn Valley was proposing to grant tax breaks to attract a data center. Although that may not have been the author’s intended meaning, the distinction should be clear:
The City of Linn Valley did not propose, offer, or approve a tax incentive for a data center.
Kansas Senate Bill 98 created a state-authorized, 20-year sales-and-use-tax exemption for qualifying data centers. The Kansas Legislature enacted that policy—not Linn Valley.
A data center that qualifies under SB 98 may receive the exemption whether it locates in Linn Valley or elsewhere in Kansas. Linn Valley did not create the exemption, cannot repeal it, and does not control whether qualifying projects elsewhere in the state receive it.
The exemption is also not an exemption from every tax, fee, or financial obligation. Electricity is expressly excluded. Under Linn Valley Ordinance No. 266, Evergy pays the City a franchise fee equal to 5% of gross receipts charged and collected for electricity sold within the City’s corporate boundaries. Preliminary estimates indicated that a large electricity user could have generated approximately $3 million annually in franchise-fee revenue under the assumptions examined. That was a projection, not a guarantee.
For context, Linn Valley currently receives approximately $880,000 annually in property-tax revenue. This helps explain why the potential franchise-fee revenue was examined as a tax-cutting opportunity for the community. Providing that context does not mean I am asking anyone to reconsider the issue, and it does not change my position.
I also want to be clear about the City Council. My position is my own. The Council has not reached a final decision and wants to continue gathering information and citizen feedback. That is its right and its duty.
Due diligence includes studying potential advantages and disadvantages, examining safeguards, asking questions, and listening to residents. I support each councilmember’s responsibility to conduct that work in the manner they believe is appropriate before reaching a decision. Their continued research should not be interpreted as approval, and my position should not be presented as the Council’s final decision.
People may support or oppose these facilities, and that is their right. I am not trying to change those opinions. I am simply committed to ensuring that discussions involving the City are based on a clear and accurate record. When I believe something creates a materially misleading impression that could harm public trust in the City, I will provide the relevant facts and sources.
Sources:
Kansas SB 98:
https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/documents/view-leg/?apn=b2025_26%2Fyear1%2Fready_for_publication%2Fsb_98%2Fsb98_enrolled.pdf
Kansas Legislative Research Department summary:
https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/documents/view-leg/?apn=b2025_26%2Fds_docs_li%2Fsummary_sb_98_2025.pdf
Linn Valley Ordinance No. 266, contained in the September 2024 City Council packet:
https://www.linnvalleyks.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Full-Packet.pdf
Send a message to learn more