05/29/2026
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Press release #2
Below is a new press release response to Surry County's press release that was shared via social media earlier today. Please read and share!
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Joint Statement from Skull Camp Volunteer Fire Department, Franklin Community Volunteer
Fire Department, and Bannertown Volunteer Fire Department
May 28, 2026
Statement from Skull Camp Volunteer Fire Department, Franklin Community Volunteer Fire Department, and Bannertown Volunteer Fire Department Regarding the County's
Recent Public Statement The Boards of Directors of Skull Camp Volunteer Fire Department, Franklin Community Volunteer Fire Department, and Bannertown Volunteer Fire Department have reviewed the recent statement issued by Surry County regarding the proposed fire service agreements.
On one point, we fully agree with the County.
Community assets should be protected. In fact, protecting community assets is precisely why our Boards have declined to execute the proposed agreements in their current form.
The buildings, apparatus, equipment, and other property owned by our departments WERE NOT purchased by Surry County. They were purchased and built over generations by the citizens of our fire districts through fire taxes that the citizens paid, not the county, charitable donations, fundraising efforts, volunteer labor, and countless hours of community service.
For around fifty+ years, the citizens of these communities invested their time, money, labor, and trust into building these organizations. The assets held by these nonprofit corporations belong to the charitable mission for which they were acquired and are held for the benefit of the communities that built and supported them.
OUR DEPARTMENTS ARE NOT ARGUING THAT ASSETS SHOULD LEAVE THE COMMUNITIES THEY WERE INTENDED TO SERVE.
If a fire department were ever to dissolve or cease operations, we believe those assets should
continue serving the citizens of the district that paid for them and supported them.
The disagreement is not about whether assets should remain dedicated to public service.The disagreement is about whether the legal process established by North Carolina law should be
followed. North Carolina nonprofit law provides a specific process for the dissolution of nonprofit corporations and the disposition of charitable assets. That process requires action by the then-
current Board of Directors, approval by the corporation's members when membership voting rights exist, and review by the North Carolina Attorney General when charitable assets are
involved.
The citizens of our fire districts are not merely taxpayers. They are the corporate members of these nonprofit organizations. Under North Carolina law, those citizens possess legal rights regarding the future of their organizations and the charitable assets those organizations hold.
OUR CONCERN IS STRAIGHTFORWARD.
The proposed contract attempts to create a predetermined outcome regarding assets in the event of termination without allowing future boards, future memberships (Our citizens), and the statutory review processes required by law to exercise their rights at the time such decisions would actually be made.
Current Boards do not possess the authority to waive or surrender the future rights of citizens who have not yet had the opportunity to vote, nor can current Boards bypass legal processes established by the State of North Carolina for the protection of charitable assets.
The issue before us is therefore not whether community assets should be protected. The issue is whether those assets should be governed by the legal process established by North
Carolina law and by the citizens who built and paid for them, or whether those decisions should be predetermined through contractual provisions executed today in a contract the County has heavy handed almost every fire department in this county to sign, just call and ask them.
Our Boards believe that NC law already provides a process for addressing these issues, and we
believe that process exists for a reason: to ensure transparency, accountability, public
participation, and independent review by the NC AG’s Office, whenever charitable assets built
by generations of citizens are affected.
We remain willing to work with County officials toward a solution that protects public safety, respects the legal rights of nonprofit corporations, preserves the rights of citizens within our fire
districts, and ensures that community assets remain dedicated to serving the communities that built them.
That has always been our position, and it remains our position today.
Hereby submitted by,
Joshua Moose, Chairman
Skull Camp Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Doug Coble, Chairman
Franklin Community Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Joseph Love, Chairman
Bannertown Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Send a message to learn more