Citizens for a Constitutional Government

10/24/2024

I'm very proud to be endorsed by this awesome lady. Nina Webber For Wyoming State Representative House District 24 is a champion for liberty. She has served as Wyoming's National Committeewoman for the last 4 years, and has done an excellent job representing Wyoming. She brought the censure of Lizzard Cheney, and did an excellent job of convincing the Republican Party to pass that motion. She is firmly pro-life, pro-2A (ACTUALLY pro-2A for real), pro-freedom, and a great friend. Recieving her endorsement is a tremendous honor, and I am humbled to be her choice for city council.
Go, fight, WIN!!!!

02/11/2021

I will not stop heaping praise on our legislators as long as they don't stop fighting for our freedom. Huge thanks to Chuck Gray, Dan Laursen, Rachel Rodriguez Williams, and Senator Tim French for co-sponsoring this. Thank you, Thank you, and thank you again.

CASPER, Wyo. — 10 Wyoming legislators are sponsoring a resolution that would put a question before voters on changing the Wyoming Constitution to require

01/29/2021

In case anybody is wondering who to vote for or donate to to get Lizzy "The Lizard" Cheney out of office, We recommend Anthony Bouchard. His work in founding Wyoming Gun Owners and getting Constitutional Carry passed was impressive, but not nearly as impressive as his voting record since taking a seat in the Wyoming Senate. He stood with the people of Wyoming against the Covid lockdowns, and he runs a septic service- so he has a lot of experience dealing with the stuff he will find in Washington, DC. He has been an ally to Constitutionalists for years, and I cannot praise his work highly enough. Visit his web page at:

American entrepreneur, businessman, husband and father, Anthony Bouchard is ready to stand up for America, defend our freedoms and always put taxpayers first.

01/29/2021

06/02/2020

Official Statement from Citizens For Constitutional Government

The death of George Floyd is a tragedy, and one which should not be tolerated by a free society. It is a natural result of a culture of police immunity and overreach. It was predictable, and many in fact predicted this type of incident for years. The militarization of the police, the qualified immunity police enjoy, and the culture of "the thin blue line" are equally at fault, and we should, as a nation, and each individual state and community, take definitive action to address these issues. George Floyd is not the only person who has been wrongfully murdered by police officers, and the overreach and uncnstitutionalactions of police officers, supported by their departments, are many and varied. Not 1 single police officer in the US has followed the Constitution, and EVERY SINGLE OFFICER should be held accountable.
However, accoutability is not achieved by looting Target or burning Autozone. Attacking innocent people to protest innocent people being victimized is as counterproductive and stupid as it sounds.
ANTIFA is a terrorist organization, they don't do anything constructive, all they do is break things. They are criminals, and despicable human beings. CFCG has NO affiliation with them, nor will we sanction or participate in any event they are sponsoring. If we see them, they will be lucky to leave the encounter intact.
Black Lives Matter is a racist group, dedicated to destroying peace and fommenting a race war. We do not share these values. CFCG believes, perhaps naively, but nontheless, that we should work towards a society in which children can play together in peace, where people are judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. This puts CFCG directly at odds with BLM, and, as such, will not associate in any way with them, any more than we would with the K*K.
A republican form of government is founded on the principle that all men are created equal, and therefore, racism in any form is antithetical to republican principles. We do not, and cannot, support racists in any way, while recognizing that racism does exist. The existance of racism does not excuse rioting, looting, or violence against others based on race.
The police in the US have violated their Oaths of Office on a daily basis. The Constitution, for example, allows police to obtain a warrant for arrest based on probable cause. They routinely arrest people without that warrant, but merely upon probable cause. Regardless of the SCOTUS' decision, that is a violation of the US Constitution. More eggregious examples abound, from enforcing unconstitutional lockdown orders, to the murder of innocent civilians, George Floyd being but one example. Because of this pattern of behavior, police may not count CFCG as an ally. We will do our part to protect the citizens of this great country, and will not actively attack law enforcement personellor property, but the police should not look to us as allies.

01/26/2017

Why the "women's march" was a failure, and why that is good for America.
Saturday, hundreds of women donned big va**na suits and gathered to listen to people like Madonna speak politics. They claim it was a huge thing, and there were people there, but it was a total, unabashed failure. Sure, they got people out of their houses, and even got a lot of press coverage, but that wasn't their goal, nor will it make any lasting difference, and here's why.
First, their goals were unrealistic. Getting people to hate Trump, or make them wish he wasn't president, or oppose his actions after all of the other protests over the last 2 months is and was unrealistic at best, and counterproductive to their cause. Let's face it, at this point those who voted for Trump are pointing at these idiots and saying "this is WHY I voted for Trump." And blaming Trump for anything the day after he was inaugurated is not only illogical, but obviously partisan, so it won't win over undecideds, if that was even a part of their plan. It also weakens any real arguments they may have, few as they are.
But their real goal was one that Soros and friends have had for a LONG time- to create a liberal Tea-Party, and that will be the biggest failure to spring from Saturday's fiasco. In order to understand this, you have to actually understand what the Tea-Party is, and how it happened. So what happened to create the TP? First, we had a "conservative" president who betrayed every conservative principle, and a Republican candidate to replace him who was, well, pathetic. So a dyed in the wool, unashamed socialist won an election and we saw policies and legislation that was really anti- American Dream coming down on us, fundamentally transforming the nation. So a stock broker on tv said "we should get together and have a tea party" in a very excited way. Somebody called a friend, and another, and pretty soon, they had to have the party in a park. A few people called radio stations, and tv stations, permits were acquired, and people involved used the skills they had to organize and arrange, and a protest happened. This was pretty unnerving to a lot of people, because conservatives don't protest, or at least we hadn't. Nobody knows how many people showed up, because nobody thought to count, and nobody even knew where all the parties were. And to be fair, we had our silly costumes and our fringe idiots, racists, and the like, but we did a great job of keeping it peaceful and policing our own (I have some pretty good video of a couple neo-nazis not only being run off, but having their ideology used to do it). We went on to organize and get better connected, and in 2 short years, we had candidates being elected to the house and senate. We had passion, energy, and skill, and we gained knowledge and tolerance. We included groups that we didn't always agree with, but we had a 51% policy- If you and I agree on 51% of the issues, we are more friend than foe. We included some groups that were "conservative" and some that were "libertarian" and of course, some "constitutional." It's pretty cool when a police officer and a guy who wants to legalize pot have a friendly conversation and walk away agreeing on something. Or when a guy with a sign that says "Recovering Liberal" makes more friends in 1 day than he has had in his entire life. It was an awesome thing to see and be a part of, and something the Women's March doesn't have. After being hyped, planned, and advertised (every night on CNN and CBS) for 2 months, any spontaneity and "grassroots" are gone- strike 1. They were astroturfed every bit as much as the Coffee party and the Other 95. And that is why those groups failed in the first place. Where the Tea-party was inclusive- tax protesters, pro-lifers, home-school advocates, and religious conservatives as well as many others- the womans march was concentrated on 2 things- "We hate Trump" and "I want to kill my baby." If you disagreed with either, you weren't welcome. Kinda limits how many people you can convince, if you are an all or nothing kind of thing- Strike 2. And finally, by excluding any objections that half the population may have to Trump in the name of radical Feminism, and demonizing a good deal of the population based on being born with a p***s, they destroyed any chance of having a sustained, organic movement in society- and that was the real lasting effect of the Tea-party. So that makes strike 3.
The Tea-Party garnered hatred from the Obama administration and the main stream press, but the average American realized that we had good arguments and we articulated them well. We made reasoned arguments, and while the left called us racists, people on the outside- those who hadn't taken sides- heard the arguments and listened. And were swayed. So much that a single person- Mitt Romney- can be used as an example. In 2008, he was the "conservative" Republican. In 2012, he was the "Establishment" Republican, and in 2016, he was the "washed up has been of the past" Republican, whose views were blasted as "leftist" by no less than 5 presidential hopefuls. We may not have won presidential elections, but we shifted the views of the American people sharply to the right. And that won't be an effect of the women's va**na parade.

12/20/2016

In light of the recent rash of terrorist attacks using semi-trucks, I think it is time for common sense semi-truck control. All drivers of commercial vehicles should be licensed, and should be fingerprinted and background checked. These "assault vehicles" should be registered and they should have to stop and submit to searches anytime they cross a border. They should be taxed heavily, and we should restrict their movement to certain "truck routes." Prospective drivers should have to attend state approved training courses at their own expense before being licensed. Additionally, anyone who wants to drive one should have to have a physical and prove to a law enforcement official that they have the ability and knowledge to use one safely and lawfully. There is no reason for these massive killing machines to be in the hands of criminals.
We need to re-examine the Constitutional provision for unrestricted travel, and revoke it to protect innocent children shopping for Christmas/ Hanukkah / Kwanzaa presents. After all, the founders never could have imagined the destructive power of these massive implements of destruction. Keep our children safe.
PS, this is a parody of liberal calls for gun control, and all of the measures I called for are already implemented.

11/30/2016

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

These words have been attributed to Martin Niemoller, but he said he wasn't sure he had ever actually said them. He did express the sentiment, though, so let's not nit-pick. Recently, I have seen several liberals quoting or paraphrasing these words and implying that President-elect Trump will be rounding people up. And that really pi**es me off for several reasons.
First off, these pathetic sensationalists are claiming to have some moral high ground based on standing up for muslims, illegal immigrants, or whatever other group they think Trump will "round up." Personally, I don't think that is what Trump has in mind at all, though I am not sure he even has a coherent plan for some things. Will he deport illegal immigrants? He had better. Does this equate to "rounding them up" as implied by quoting Niemoller? Not quite, sending people back to the country they are citizens of is not the equivalent of packing them into gas chambers. Nor is sending people who claim to be refugees to refugee camps closer to the place they are from. So quit with the moral claims.
More importantly, though, is the implication that government overreach and the trampling of personal liberty is just beginning. These people are claiming that all of a sudden, and simply because Trump won an election, civil liberties and personal freedom are being eroded. I was asked when I "joined" the tea party once. I responded with "1989, when daddy Bush banned the importation of assault rifles. That weekend, I bought my first assault rifle, and became a tea-partier." I spoke up very loudly when Clinton signed the Omnibus Crime Bill into law. I spoke up when the BATF killed Randy Weaver's wife while she held her infant on their porch. I spoke up when they attacked the Branch Davidians. I spoke out against the Patriot act, and defied it to the best of my ability. When Obama signed executive orders allowing the murder of US citizens without due process, I objected. I protested when Obamacare was passed, calling it "the biggest invasion of personal liberty since the Patriot act." And where were these bleeding heart pansies? They were calling me a racist, white supremacist, and domestic terrorist. Not one of these pathetic liberals said there was anything wrong with these invasions of civil rights.
So what is the final take? Maybe they do have some claim to the poem, since Niemoller's point was that HE DID NOTHING. He was guilty of allowing the N**i government to persecute the communists, trade unionists, and jews. He only spoke up when it was him being put into the concentration camp. Likewise with these modern liberals, they said NOTHING until it looks like they might be attacked. Conservatives, whether of the libertarian strain or the constitutionalist type, have been speaking up for years. We have the real moral high ground, as we stood up for the other guy. We put ourselves at risk when we weren't on our own. We have been fighting for years to prevent the erosion of their rights. And now they want to join the fight.

11/15/2016

As a Conservative, I would like to let liberals in on a little secret about why Hillary lost, and why it really is insignificant. Back in 2008, when conservatives like me watched Obama win an election, and watched Democrats take over congress, state legislatures, and local governments, we felt as though the world was ending. I was scared, very scared. So we organized protests (we called them Tea Parties), and we found out how little we actually knew about politics, and about ourselves. We had bought into political correctness, if not actively, then by our silence. We had allowed the Republican Party to slide to the left, chasing the Democrats toward socialism, and we had to face the fact that WE had allowed it to happen. We looked in the mirror, and we faced our own faults. And we vowed to never let it happen again.
So we didn't. We read and learned. We listened and learned. We studied, and we talked, and we watched, and we learned. We found new ways to communicate, and to let each other know what was really going on. We found out which Republicans were the enemy, and which stood for our beliefs. We ran for offices that needed a new face, and we had some success, and we failed. We continued meeting with our friends, and we continued learning.
All the while, liberals called us names. You called us "tea-baggers" and we looked it up. We started calling ourselves that, wearing your insult with pride. You called us racist, and we did a lot of soul-searching. Turns out you were wrong, but thanks for giving us the opportunity to double check. But you continued to call us racists. We learned how to make intelligent, well reasoned arguments, and you called us racists and thought you won. Then you called us Homophobes. We checked, wrong again, but you thought you won the argument. You called us misogynists, guess what? Wrong again. Another argument you thought you won. We argued intelligently, convincing people of our beliefs, but you thought you won the argument. We had free reign to let people see the truth, and you did nothing to stop it, because you thought you won the argument. Of course, your arguments would have lost anyway, because they are based on falsehoods anyway, but you could have at least made them. Instead, you taught us that you used slurs because you couldn't win. So when you called somebody else a racist, we knew they weren't, either. At this point, you could say that the K*K was racist and we would check it out ourselves. You can't be trusted. But you persisted. So we won elections. In 2010, we took back the House. In 2014, the Senate as well. And we took control of more state legislatures, and local governments, too. We had learned which levels of government took care of which issues, and we took those positions seriously. We didn't get Obama out, but he was the least of our worries. The establishment Republicans needed dealt with first. We cleaned our own house first, and we had gotten pretty good at it by the time this election cycle began. So we took Hillary's abuse, we took your name calling, and we talked to our friends. We ran for offices ourselves, and we ignored your attacks. We went to the polls, quietly, and cast our votes. And Trump won. But there's more. Our votes didn't stop there. Republicans moved back to the right as a group, and are now more conservative, more "tea-party" than you would like to believe. And conservatives gave the Republican party a lot of seats in state legislatures- A LOT. In fact, the Republican party is now 3 votes- 3 - away from being able to ratify Constitutional Amendments without a single Democrat. THAT is how calling us racists won the argument for you.
But then, we've been here before. The last time the Republican party ran the tables like this, we got the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments out of it. Look them up. It will do you some good.