09/02/2026
On Monday, Michigan Rep. Hillary Scholten joined just three other House Democrats — Josh Gottheimer, Jared Moskowitz and Tom Suozzi — in putting forward their own amendment condemning socialism “in all its forms,” including the Democratic Socialists of America. The move came in direct response to a Republican effort explicitly designed to force Democrats into an ideologically divisive vote.
With the November 3 general election now just 63 days away, the political judgment behind that decision deserves scrutiny. Republicans are attempting to nationalize cultural and ideological divisions inside the Democratic coalition. Rather than rejecting that premise and redirecting attention toward affordability, health care, housing, wages and the Trump administration, Scholten chose to participate in it.
And this is not an isolated decision.
Scholten, an immigration attorney by profession, voted for the Laken Riley Act. She voted for the congressional resolution honoring Charlie Kirk. More recently, she has become one of the most outspoken Democratic critics of Michigan’s Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate, Abdul El-Sayed, criticism that has continued into the general election and has now drawn pushback from her own constituents.
Congressional resolutions are not merely symbolic. They communicate what lawmakers believe deserves public attention, whose political framing they are willing to legitimize and where they intend to spend their political capital.
Sixty-three days before an enormously consequential general election, Scholten’s actions seem to be helping litigate bad faith and factually inaccurate Republican arguments about democratic socialism creating a very public fight with members of her own coalition.