04/28/2026
The Hancock County Sheriff’s Office would like to highlight several ways we have worked responsibly to save taxpayer dollars while maintaining public safety.
Since 2021, we have added four K9 units—without any cost to taxpayers. Every dollar for their purchase and training was secured through donations, thanks to the outstanding efforts of the Hancock County Sheriff’s Deputy Association.
Another major cost-saving resource is our Sheriff’s Reserves. These dedicated volunteers assist with road closures and other non-law enforcement duties at all hours and in all conditions. Their service significantly reduces overtime expenses, allowing us to direct limited funding toward critical patrol positions, the very positions currently being considered for cuts. While they are not sworn officers, their contributions are invaluable, and we are extremely grateful for their commitment.
In terms of grants and federal funding, it has been stated that a “grant program” was initiated. While hiring a grant writer is helpful, it is not a program by itself. Our office actively identifies opportunities, gathers required information, and works closely with grant writer Joe Edmiston to secure funding. Through this collaborative effort, we have obtained approximately $870,000. These funds have been used to purchase seven vehicles, body cameras, in-car cameras, and ballistic vests, with roughly $140,000 remaining for technology upgrades and radios. (The vests were secured by our administrative staff.)
There has also been a misrepresentation regarding $40,000 in federal funds intended for a training/conference room. It is true the funds were not used within the required timeframe. However, this delay was largely due to the need for demolition work. When we sought to move forward, the Commission preferred that county maintenance staff complete the work to save money. While we agreed, those staff members are already stretched thin, and the project was delayed without a clear timeline. Additionally, the claim that this room would save over $100,000 annually on training costs is inaccurate. Our entire annual training budget is approximately $18,000, and we are unsure how that figure was calculated along with other “Data”
We also recognize the broader financial challenges facing the county. The most significant loss has been the reduction of video lottery revenue from Mountaineer Park—an amount equal to or greater than the current deficit. Commissioners Chek and Cowey were in office at the time this occurred, yet no action was taken. In contrast, I contacted both of our state senators and spoke directly with the governor, though the issue remains unresolved.
At the same time, there are positive economic indicators on the horizon, including new and expanding developments such as Bidell in Weirton, the hydroelectric project in New Cumberland, and growth at Ergon and Nucor. With these improvements, it raises an important question: why implement deep cuts now?
There are reasonable alternatives. Even without our voluntary 5% reduction, the county has options to address short-term budget gaps without exhausting reserves. For example, other counties have used opioid settlement funds to support law enforcement and jail-related expenses. Despite holding these funds for nearly four years, our requests for support—particularly for Drug Task Force manpower, cameras, and other resources—have been denied.
As of March 31, 2026, the county maintains over $4 million in reserve accounts. We are not suggesting these funds be depleted, but using a small portion—approximately 2% over 2 years—to bridge short-term gaps is both reasonable and fiscally responsible.
Funds include:
1. Capital Improvement Investment $1,373.114.74
2. Special Projects CD $1,006,813.96
3. Rainey Day Fund CD’s $1,280,586.37
4. Long term Capital CD $319,083.19
5. Capital Improvement CD $105,514.75
Total $4,085,113.01
One concern throughout this process has been the consistent presentation of misleading or incomplete information. In 2024 they claimed they were telling us about that trouble was coming, the Commission approved a larger budget for 2024–2025, then proposed a 30% reduction for 2025–2026. We ultimately took close to an 18% cut, losing 5 positions. Despite Commissioner Cowey claims a 12% cut for the rest of the county that is just smoke and mirrors. If you look at the number and take the entire budget minus Public Safety, there is only a 1.1% cut. During this same period, the Commission office’s own budget increased, and they were handing out raises, while the Sheriff’s Office eliminated five positions.
There are also ongoing discrepancies in how our budget is represented. Figures attributed to the Sheriff’s Office often include categories beyond our operational control, such as PROs and courthouse security. When these are properly separated, the numbers presented publicly do not align, leaving significant unexplained differences.
Ultimately, there are more effective and responsible solutions than reducing the Sheriff’s Office budget by 15%. The question that remains is whether this effort is truly about balancing the budget—or is it just a way to promote an agenda to Defund this Sheriffs’ Office.
This is not Politics it is working to safeguard the Safety and Welfare of this County. We have been willing to work with commissioners, coming up with another 5% cut this coming year. But Commissioners Cowey and Chek have showed absolutely no intention of working with us.