06/14/2026
I’d like to spend a few minutes talking about advocacy vs politics so that I can be fully transparent about what you can expect from me over the next few months.
When I ran for the Board of Education, I was very clear that partisan politics had no place on the Board or in education. During my campaign, I remained non-partisan and asked voters to evaluate me based on my experience, qualifications, and vision for the future rather than any political party I may or may not align with.
At the same time, there are issues that directly affect public education, our students, our staff, and our schools. When those issues arise, I believe it is appropriate, and in many cases necessary, for school board members to speak about them. Part of serving on a Board of Education is advocating for public education and helping provide information that allows our community to make well-informed decisions. This was very much the case when Prop RT was on the April ballot.
With that said, that does not mean I believe school board members should use their position to support or oppose every amendment, proposition, or political issue that appears on a ballot. I was elected to help govern a school district, not to serve as a commentator on every political issue facing our state or country. With this in mind, I will continue to keep my word that any advocacy I engage in will be limited to issues that directly affect public education.
A good example is Amendment 5 on the August ballot. Its stated goal is to gradually reduce and ultimately eliminate Missouri’s income tax while replacing that revenue through increases in sales tax. I may have personal opinions about this proposal as a whole, but as a Board member, my focus is on what it means for public education.
From an educational perspective, my concern is whether schools can reliably forecast future revenue and build responsible budgets. Sales tax revenue is tied more closely to consumer spending and economic conditions, creating greater uncertainty when projecting future funding. Public schools operate best when funding is stable and predictable.
I’ve said before that nobody enjoys paying taxes. At the same time, taxes fund public education. Missouri has struggled for years to fully fund the foundation formula, even under the current system. For FY27, the district purposefully budgeted below what we should be receiving, only to find we were being funded even less than that! Given those challenges, I believe it would be risky to move away from a revenue source that has historically been a major component of state funding and replace it with a system that may make future revenue even harder to predict.
As always, please do your own independent research so you can make a well informed decision in August. There are other amendments and propositions on the horizon that I will be commenting on, but for now please focus your attention on Amendment 5.