Pagosa Transparency Project

Pagosa Transparency Project A local records project asking Archuleta County government straightforward questions and publishing the answers. First up: the license plate reader system.

pagosatransparency.org

PUBLIC RECORDS UPDATEThe Town of Pagosa Springs has produced records in response to our request. Here is what they show....
07/31/2026

PUBLIC RECORDS UPDATE

The Town of Pagosa Springs has produced records in response to our request. Here is what they show.

On August 5, 2025, Sheriff Mike Le Roux and Police Chief Bill Rockensock presented the Flock camera system to the Town Council. According to the approved minutes, the county had four cameras already in use. The Sheriff asked to add two more inside Town limits, at $5,000 per camera per year, with funding lined up for two years.

The minutes end that item this way: Council is in agreement to move forward with the Flock camera system in joint efforts with Archuleta County.

That item appears under Presentations. The minutes record no ordinance, no resolution, no motion, no second and no vote. On the same agenda that night, the sewer sales tax question got a first reading, an attorney's analysis, a motion, a second and a recorded result. The surveillance camera expansion got a presentation and an agreement to move forward.

The Town has also now confirmed, in writing, that its Police Department has no written policy, no procedure, no general order, no MOU, no training material and no roll call guidance of any kind governing what officers do when a Flock alert comes in.

And the Town produced the dispatch data. Every Flock alert sent to Pagosa Springs Police between August 22, 2025 and July 16, 2026 is in the second image. Thirteen calls. Three ended in arrest. Two, officers could not locate the vehicle. One was unfounded.

We are publishing that arrest number because it is what the record says. Three arrests is not nothing. Whether it justifies the cost, the expansion, and the absence of any written rule is a judgment for this community to make, which is the entire point of putting the documents in front of you.

Twelve of those thirteen calls were on county highways, at US 160 mile markers, County Road 359 and US 84, and State Highway 151. One was inside town.

What we still do not know: whether the two town cameras were ever installed, what the county's contract with Flock actually says, who outside this county can search the data, and how long it is kept. Those requests are with Archuleta County and the Sheriff's Office and remain open.

The third image is the full minutes page, uncropped, so you can check the excerpt against the original. Every document referenced here will be posted in full on the site, including the parts that favor the agencies.

pagosatransparency.org

PUBLIC RECORDS UPDATEOn July 29 we filed public records requests with Archuleta County, the Archuleta County Sheriff's O...
07/30/2026

PUBLIC RECORDS UPDATE

On July 29 we filed public records requests with Archuleta County, the Archuleta County Sheriff's Office, and the Town of Pagosa Springs about the Flock Safety license plate reader cameras operating in this county.

The Town has answered twice.

First answer, July 29: the Town and the Pagosa Springs Police Department have no agreement with Flock Safety, no direct access to the system, do not perform searches or enter information into it, and possess none of the requested records.

Second answer, today, from the Chief of Police: PSPD does receive Flock notifications, indirectly, because the Police Department and the Sheriff's Office run on the same dispatch CAD system. And the Police Department has no written policy or MOU covering those notifications.

So, on the record as of today: Pagosa Springs police officers receive automated license plate reader alerts, and there is no written policy governing what they do with them.

We are not saying anyone broke a rule. There does not appear to be a written rule.

Both emails are below, unedited. Read them yourself.

Still outstanding are the requests to Archuleta County and to the Sheriff's Office, which operates the system. Those ask for the contract, the cost, who is authorized to run a search, how long the data is kept, and which outside agencies can access it.

Every request we file and every response we get is posted here as it arrives. Follow the page for the documents.

pagosatransparency.org

First answer is in, and it came back the same day.We asked the Town of Pagosa Springs for the contract, the cost, the re...
07/30/2026

First answer is in, and it came back the same day.

We asked the Town of Pagosa Springs for the contract, the cost, the retention period, and the search logs for the license plate reader cameras in this area.

The Town's response: neither the Town nor the Pagosa Springs Police Department has an agreement with Flock Safety. Neither has direct access to the system. Neither performs searches. They hold none of the records we requested.

They identified the Archuleta County Sheriff's Office as the operator of the system.

Credit where it's due. That was fast, clear, and straightforward, and it tells us exactly where to look next.

Still pending: Archuleta County and the Sheriff's Office. Under state law, custodians have three working days to respond.

Whatever they send, we post it.

Were you aware there are license plate readers operating in this county?

Why this page exists.There are automated license plate reader cameras operating in Archuleta County. They photograph pas...
07/30/2026

Why this page exists.

There are automated license plate reader cameras operating in Archuleta County. They photograph passing vehicles and store the results in a database that can be searched later.

We had simple questions about them. Who authorized the system? What does it cost? How long is a record of your movements kept? Which agencies can search it?

So we asked, in writing, using the Colorado Open Records Act. Requests are now on file with Archuleta County, the Sheriff’s Office, and the Town of Pagosa Springs.

This page will report what comes back, whatever it says.

We are not against law enforcement having tools. The questions here are procedural, not personal: what are the written terms of this system, and were they adopted in public?

Every request and response is tracked at pagosatransparency.org

Address

Highway 160
Pagosa Springs, CO
81147

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Pagosa Transparency Project posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share