01/28/2026
I believe that getting into a situation with a firearm involving observing and recording law enforcement officers / protesting (especially when law enforcement is involved) is a bad idea, ONLY because some of these law enforcement officers who are cosplaying as N**i Storm Troopers are CONTINUOUSLY AND ACTIVELY fishing for an excuse to shoot someone. So when it comes to Alex Pretti, I don't think him simply having a firearm was a justified reason for him to be shot like that. However it makes it easier for them to attempt to get a justification. Anyone who is blindly justifying this without proper investigation is proving my point.
Was Alex there with the intention of protesting I.C.E? I don't know.
Was Alex reaching for his weapon? I don't know.
Was Alex's firearm misfired and the officers responded like that? I don't know.
All I know is that he had a firearm, It was taken by a federal agent who in my opinion should have immediately unloaded it, and there wasn't a second firearm he had so it seems like he was armed then disarmed and if he was there in passing it would make sense that he had it on him, but knowing that, officers have certain immunities and they can interpret the situation very easily based on their immunities and their "best" judgment. So if he went there to protest or record I personally wouldn't suggest going to a situation like that with a weapon ESPECIALLY a firearm.
I AM BY NO MEANS suggesting that what Alex Pretti was doing was illegal or justified what happened to him. Based on what I saw. I believe the situation should be thoroughly investigated, and those who are against just the possibility of an investigation have lost their minds and/or doesn't understand how the justice system is supposed to work.
You are under the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in the court of law. If you are immediately against an investigation and claim that federal officers can't be charged under the stipulation of immunity, What is the harm in challenging the immunity In the courts of Justice, especially if it could further prove their innocence?
If you're claiming that the courts of Justice could determine that the person is guilty despite the immunity they have; then Shouldn't justice be served? Are you claiming the immunity of federal officers can't be questioned in the courts?
We're not talking about Bribery or a scandal requiring deep investigation, we're talking about A group of federal agents shooting a man who's on the ground to death, and consideration of looking into that situation is making people upset. And the excuse is he had a gun. And what I'm saying is let's look into it!
This is also nothing against the majority of law enforcement officers. I don't want anyone using what I said here as a promotion to harass or assault any law enforcement officers who are out here. I'm referring to the scum bags who give our law enforcement a bad name.
