https://www.facebook.com/101350131330763/

Vladimir Poopin, 1200S Madison Avenue, Plainfield, IA (2026)

03/08/2026

P**o predicts future.

03/03/2026

Let's face it - He's a fuc*king Loser (Oops, I might have misspelt c*nt).

03/01/2026

This didn’t age well.

03/01/2026

You know things are pretty bad for you when you have to start a war to cover up where you were putting your dick twenty years ago.

02/25/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/187WX3nbz1/

BREAKING: DOJ Files Indicate FBI Sought to Pursue Child S*x Trafficking Investigation Into Trump Based on Accuser’s Account

Bombshell new reporting by journalist Roger Sollenberger

Newly surfaced details from the DOJ’s Epstein files make one thing unmistakably clear: federal authorities took seriously the allegation from an Epstein victim who told the FBI that Donald Trump s*xually assaulted her as a child — and sought her cooperation in what appears to have been a potential criminal child s*x trafficking investigation.

As first reported by Roger Sollenberger, internal FBI records show the woman was identified as a victim who “claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate.” Former senior DOJ officials say this language strongly indicates that federal investigators approached her about helping pursue a criminal case involving Trump.

In other words, the FBI was not dismissing her account. They were attempting to build a case.

The internal email, dated July 22, 2025 and titled “Names in JE file,” lists Trump first among “positive case hits.” Notably, none of the other prominent names mentioned in Epstein-related materials carry similar annotations suggesting a victim allegation tied to potential prosecution.

This aligns with other reporting showing that the woman held a uniquely sensitive status in the DOJ’s files. She is reportedly the only victim marked “PROTECT SOURCE” — a designation indicating heightened concern about retaliation.

In one released FBI interview, her attorney cited “fear of retaliation” when Trump’s name was raised. That context sheds light on why she may have declined to cooperate further, even as investigators appeared interested in moving forward.

At least four FBI interviews with the accuser exist. Yet only one has been released publicly.

The remaining interviews — along with accompanying FBI notes — remain in federal possession but undisclosed, despite the DOJ acknowledging that versions of these materials exist outside the protective order tied to the Ghislaine Maxwell case.

The DOJ’s handling of the broader Epstein file release has already drawn intense criticism. The rollout exposed sensitive victim information, including names, identifying details, and reportedly even uncensored images of young females.

Adding to the controversy, the DOJ initially published the name of the Trump accuser before later redacting it. Another identifying detail tied to her case reportedly remains unredacted in the public database.

Taken together, the records suggest the federal government viewed this woman’s allegation not as peripheral, but as potentially central to a prosecutable matter.

A DOJ spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.