07/31/2015
IE denizen, MARY KAY consultant and Hi**er apologist extols the virtues of war because it drives "away the threat of extinction." I can't even wrap my mind around that one. She goes on to say that "liberalism is the poison of states" because "it argues that all can be together as one group." So much for the American melting pot experiment, I guess. She then goes on to justify the "brutal efficiency" of the N***s and the Holocaust. Finally, she argues that "the necessity of war... gives the opportunity for a culture to display dominance over another, and ensure its prosperity."
So, with this reasoning, all manner of human atrocities are justified. Gosh, where do I start? How about the Spanish Inquisition, which was directed mostly at Jews who refused to convert to Christianity, and all manner of horrendous torture was inflicted on them. What about the Native Americans? Millions killed so that the God given right of European Christianity could dominate and "prosper" because their culture was so superior. Let's move on to American slavery. Surely, the Africans were inferior and needed to be dominated by a superior culture. How about Viet Nam? Surely, the Vietnamese were in desperate need of American democracy, to the point that we wiped out entire villages with na**lm and killed off 50.000 of our own young men for the purpose. This is the most repugnant argument for hegemony I have ever heard.
