10/14/2021
Core Issues: Addressing our
Present Concerns and Planning for the Future
• The county property (48 acres) within the Borough of Rockleigh be re-zoned Husbandry – Equestrian and Organic Farming - 3 Acre minimum lot sizes, NOT Industrial.
Approximately 7 years ago, the State of NJ and Bergen County initiated discussions to sell the 48 acre property north of Paris Avenue and west of Piermont Road. At that time the Borough of Rockleigh quickly rezoned the property for industrial use. Do we want to be known as an “Industrial Park” or a Historical Town with horse farms, farming, and large homes? We would like to see this property re-zoned prior to sale of the property.
• EPA issues with the Carlee Factory need be actively addressed and communicated to the residents of Rockleigh.
For more than 10 years, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) deemed Carlee Corp. a contaminated site. See DEP file – Master File Site ID 14157 PI Number 006034 CARLEE CORP 28 PIERMONT RD. Residents have tried to find out what contaminants are present and how residents have been affected, to no avail. We would bring transparency to such a serious issue by keeping residents updated and ensuring that efforts are taken to remediate any toxic substances in our town.
• Address and comply with affordable housing requirements imposed by Federal and State government.
Approximately 2 years ago, the Borough of Rockleigh was cited as not meeting its requirements for affordable housing requirements. On March 10, 2015, in a unanimous (6-0) decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court clarified the procedures for determining affordable housing in the 566 municipalities in the state. As a result of the long history of inaction by the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH), the Court found “there no longer exists a legitimate basis to block access to the court” for parties concerned with municipal compliance with the constitutional obligation to provide a realistic opportunity for the provision of affordable housing. The Borough is scheduled to be re-examined in 2025. What are we actively doing to meet our requirements? Due to their inaction, many other municipalities have been subject to steep fines and finding themselves at the mercy of developers building large affordable housing developments that affect the dynamics of the town. We would engage the residents to determine the best course of action and proactively address these requirements.
• Independent leadership and fair representation.
This would involve ensuring that all correspondence, grievances or complaints to the Borough is addressed promptly, respectfully, and compliant with the standards and ethics bestowed upon the governing body. This would also include all Boards, Committees and Independent Boards – like the Board of Education. An example is that all Northvale Board of Education and Old Tappan Northern Valley District Board of Education meetings are attended by at least one designated member of the Rockleigh Board of Education and detailed minutes / notes are recorded.
• Accountability and transparency at all levels of governance. This would include having all Borough of Rockleigh meetings audio recorded including those of all Boards and Committees. Also, all outside contracts and vendors operating within the Borough, including the vendors authorized by the Board of Education, should be reviewed annually and go to bid at least every 2 years.
• Zero-tolerance for discrimination, physical or verbal abuse, un-ethical behavior, defamation, disrespect, offensive actions, slander, vilification, libel, etc. within the governing body of the Borough of Rockleigh or within the Borough itself.
All residents and non-residents of Rockleigh or anyone else all need to be treated with respect, courtesy, civility, and without discrimination. The governing body of the Borough of Rockleigh must adhere and enforce these principles to the highest of standards and take appropriate actions when offenses occur.
• The Planning Board within the Borough of Rockleigh has always been controversial. A complete review by the Mayor and Counsel and the Planning Board should be conducted to address all issues or concerns residents have brought up.
By example:
** Extended discussions over 12 months to institute a Pool Ordnance, a Shed Ordinance, & Solar Panel Ordinance are not considered effective or efficient processing of legislation,
** fee structures to applicants, capped fees, and responsibility of fees,
** conflicting variance requirements,
** extra burden of processing an application for a non-conforming residential lot which is automatically thrown into a variance application is not effective or efficient processing of legislation, ETC.