The Child Support Abolitionist

05/05/2024

I’m in the process of writing and publishing an NFT that will provide the proven recipe and sample documents to assist “non-custodial” parents succeed in dismissing welfare recoupment complaints and restoring normalcy to their lives.

I have decided to move forward with an NFT because it will enable the purchaser (“non-custodial parent”) to recapture their investment by reselling their NFT after they are finished using the information and documents.

I understand those of you who are enduring “child support” cases are financially challenged. Anyone investing in the NFT can consider it a loan since they can recapture their initial investment by selling it. The quicker you use the data, the more quickly you can resell the NFT and re-capture your initial investment.

Please feel free to comment and ask questions.


02/12/2024

There are multiple ways to win a welfare recoupment (“child support”) case. You don’t need a dismissal from dual-employed judge / health department subcontractor, which will NEVER happen. It’s easier to force the Plaintiff (agency or state AG) to dismiss by attacking their only “witness” and weakest link, the custodial parent. There is no case without a witness. Break the weakest link with Discovery. Discovery is the ONLY end game to the madness!

07/19/2022

Many people ask me, "What if I already have a court order to pay child support and the court is telling me that Discovery is either over or expired?" Well, in welfare recoupment cases ("child support", See Blessing v. Freestone) Discovery is on going, which is why the Plaintiff / Petitioner can repetitively petition the "court" for additional "child support" to be paid by the "non-custodial parent". They subpoena your current financials and off they go shaking you upside down again.

So, what gives them this authority? 45 CFR §303.8, which reads, "Review and adjustment of child support orders. (a) Definition. For purposes of this section, Parent includes any custodial parent or noncustodial parent (or for purposes of requesting a review, any other person or entity who may have standing to request an adjustment to the child support order)." In order to request a review, the opposing side must have access to the facts, testimony and evidence in your possession that gives them "the right" to take more money from you, which by the way, is PRIVILAGED AND PRIVATE information they ARE NOT ENTITLED TO, by law. This access to information is called, DISCOVERY! If they can demand access to your information, you can demand the same. The last thing they want is for you to get Discovery because once you do, their pseudo-judicial complaint is over.

AGAIN, as I always preach, YOU MUST GET DICOVERY IN ORDER TO WIN!! Winning isn't necessary the fake court dismissing your case/complaint/cause. Winning can also be forcing the State's only witness (your ex) to withdraw her appearance once she realizes she will be implicated for perjury when she has to produce the same Discovery you've been forced to produce. REMEMBER, the State does not verify their star "witness's" financials because it is not in their best interest to do so! But, you're going to! When the State loses their only "witness", they must withdraw or dismiss the case/complaint/cause under their own initiative. DISCOVERY BEATS "CHILD SUPPORT"!

So, what's our take away here? DISCOVERY IS ON GOING IN ALL CS CASES / COMPLAINTS / CAUSES and is REQUIRED IN ORDER TO WIN!!

05/03/2022

So, if ONLY a woman can CONSENT to her own pregnancy and birth, by default that means that the WOMAN is 100% liable for her child’s financial needs and upbringing. An “Obligor“ cannot be established without CONSENT of the alleged “Obligor.” Are you really sure you want Roe v. Wade upheld? Be careful what you wish for because I support and defend the “non-custodial” parents and we WIN!!

05/01/2022

So, I guess this was somehow in the “best interest of our children”, right? These are monsters among us. If it was not for our government’s vigilante laws, this would be a self-resolving problem with only the expense of a hollow point.

Lilly Ann Sanchez, a member of Epstein's defense team, and Matthew Menchel, one of the prosecutors who worked on the deal, were previously in a relationship.

01/13/2022

For those of you who do not have time to get Discovery before your next hearing or trial, do the following:

1. Tell the “judge“ or magistrate that you have a preliminary matter that needs to be addressed and clarified before proceeding. They will agree.

2. Ask him or her if either they and/or the “family court” are employees or subontractor’s of your state’s Department and beneficiaries of Health and Human Services.

3. Ask him or her why the “family court” is a separate entity from the actual court using the same building, the same rooms and same employees.

4. Ask him or her if they are required to uphold constitutional rights while acting as a “family court“ judge or magistrate.

5. If he or she answers truthfully by affirming any or all of the questions above (they probably won’t), you want to request that they and the “family court“ recuse themselves in their entirety for financial conflict of interest and for violating separation of powers by being an extension or arm of the executive branch of government, which is DHHS.

6. If he or she lies and denies any connection with DHHS or the executive branch of government, request a continuance until you can get clarification since Title IV-D of the Social Security Act contradicts their answer.

7. If he or she denies your continuance on those grounds, let them know that you will not be participating in the theater today. When they ask or demand any of your personal information, you shall reply, “No thank you. That is privileged and private information.“ if and when they ask you yes or no questions, you shall reply, “ I neither admit or deny anything.“ Do not cave to these criminals! This is the time to hold your ground!

DHHS nor the executive branch of government have jurisdiction or legal standing to oversee a judicial proceeding. Just the name “family court” itself is FRAUD because they are failing to disclose the material fact that they are masquerading a business proceeding as a judicial matter.

“Family court“ and the real court must remain legally separated because one represents the executive branch of government while the other represents the judicial branch of government. If family cases were heard in the real court, all other non-family cases would be corrupted, questioned and possibly over turned.

Obviously, you will be met with a lot of resistance. But, be prepared and hold your ground because you are dealing with a criminal enterprise.

09/06/2021

Paxton doesn’t give 2 sh*ts about the unborn! His priority is collecting Title IV-D money and enslaving non-custodial parents in Texas. Babies are big money for Texas!

Paxton on abortion law criticism: ‘All Texas is trying to do is protect the unborn’

https://www.foxnews.com/media/paxton-on-abortion-law-criticism-all-texas-is-trying-to-do-is-protect-the-unborn

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2021 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions. Legal Statement. Mutu...

06/28/2021

04/13/2021

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that severance in the parent-child relationship caused by the state occur only with rigorous protections for individual liberty interests at stake. Bell v. City of Milwaukee, 746 F 2d 1205; US Ct App 7th Cir WI, (1984). Father enjoys the right to associate with his children which is guaranteed by this amendment (First) as incorporated in Amendment 14. Mabra v. Schmidt, 356 F Supp 620; DC, WI (1973).

04/12/2021

"In a divorce action, a fit parent may not be denied equal legal and physical custody of a minor child without a finding by clear and convincing evidence of parental unfitness and substantial harm to the child." (See Santosky v. Kramer (1982).

04/12/2021

For those of you dealing with custodial parents who have essentially kidnapped your child(ren):

“Children must be returned to home state before child support payments are continued.” FEUER V. FEUER, 376 NYS 2d 546 [1975].

03/28/2021

During these difficult and high-anxiety times, this should make you laugh a little. Arguably, one of the best standup routines I’ve seen.

Mater, the Latin word for mother, is the root word of materialism. How did we ever get the idea that women are spiritual and men are materialistic?...Rich Zu...