12/01/2025
Significant charter amendments are being rushed through Monday's Council meeting. Here's my letter asking Council to slow down:
---
Council Members,
As a former mayor and concerned citizen, I am writing regarding the proposed charter amendments in Action Item #5. I respectfully ask that Council table this item to allow adequate time for research and deliberation.
1. Government Should Move Deliberately
Charter amendments are foundational changes we will live with for decades. They deserve careful study, not rushed votes. Good governance means resisting the urge to act quickly on significant structural changes - especially when the full implications are not yet understood.
When I addressed Rockwall County Commissioners Court about their desire to quickly alter a decades-old comprehensive plan, I made the same point: there had not been an adequate accounting of downsides. In that case, it was the risk of losing local city road funding, among others. The principle applies here as well. Before we make structural changes to our charter, we need to understand what could go wrong - not just what proponents hope will go right.
2. This Process Feels Familiar
This is not the first time charter amendments have appeared as a surprise agenda item with no prior discussion. The last time this happened, Council wisely recognized the need for deliberation and formed the Charter Commission to study the issues properly. That was the right call then. The same principle applies now.
3. These Proposals Deviate From the Charter Commission's Work
The Charter Commission - citizens who volunteered their time to study our governing documents - did not recommend these changes. Bypassing their work and established process raises questions about intent and undermines the value of citizen participation.
4. The Proposals Themselves Warrant Scrutiny
- Political appointments of city directors would fundamentally change our council-manager form of government, replacing professional hiring with political control
- The forced resignation clause would require any council member or mayor who announces candidacy for state or federal office to automatically forfeit their seat
Both deserve thorough analysis of long-term consequences before any vote.
5. We Have Resources We Should Use
Frank Garza is an excellent resource. I encourage Council to ask him to research cities where councils are involved in hiring. What were the outcomes? What unintended consequences emerged? What does micromanagement of professional staff look like in practice?
This research should happen before we vote - not after we discover problems.
6. My Request
Please table Action Item #5 and allow Council members adequate time to:
- Research comparable cities and outcomes
- Consult with our city attorney
- Understand the long-term effects of these structural changes
- Engage in proper deliberation
We owe it to our 55,000 residents to get this right.