Sheila Dibb, Rutland Selectboard 2007-2020

Sheila Dibb, Rutland Selectboard 2007-2020 This was not an official page for the Rutland BoS. It was a place for me to share events, news, comments on current events and concerns, as an individual.

I will continue to post here, though infrequently, and am happy to be a resource as I am able.

12/23/2024

Today is Festivus, so I'm going to air my top local government grievance: those "I Am Supremely Confident My Taxes Are Too High No Matter What" people out there.

Because in these past few holiday weeks, we have seen multiple serious structure fires - including Westminster and last night in the frigid cold in Spencer, where community mutual aid was crucial. We have seen pedestrians hit by cars. We have seen multiple accidents because of slippery roads. Here in Rutland, we have a dedicated union firefighter going through the unimaginable right now - at a hopefully-mostly-covered-by-health-insurance cost that will easily reach hundreds of thousands of dollars.

So for all those out there who put up the "NO NEW TAXES" signs in their yard at the drop of a hat, without even understanding what's going on in their town - how our public safety and service officials deserve fair wages and health insurance, how quickly things can turn wrong and show you how important strong municipal structure and professional services are, how spending judiciously on capital projects can save money in the long run - THIS IS WHERE YOUR TAXES GO.

Send a message to learn more

11/05/2024

Good morning Rutland. Go vote. Polls are open 7am-8pm

And for true fiscal responsibility, vote YES ON QUESTION 6 for the Community Preservation Act. Because this is us, saving some of our money for what we want to do with it, and having it matched by the state. Save money to make money: and use it for things that are important to our community.

Send a message to learn more

HOW IT ENDED - Board vote was too restrictive, project collapsed, take a look at the names involved, and then VOTE YES Q...
10/25/2024

HOW IT ENDED - Board vote was too restrictive, project collapsed, take a look at the names involved, and then VOTE YES QUESTION 6 FOR CPA

RUTLAND - It took three votes by the Board of Selectmen, but in a 3-2 vote Monday night, the board voted to allow the Rutland Land Conservancy to attempt to purchase the Davis Farm on Main Street, al…

We've been talking about CPA for a LONG TIME.   Rutland's first-ever Town Administrator, Margaret Nartowicz, is one of t...
10/25/2024

We've been talking about CPA for a LONG TIME.

Rutland's first-ever Town Administrator, Margaret Nartowicz, is one of the best in the business at sound, conservative, well-planned municipal financial management.

She strongly recommended Rutland adopt CPA.

See this property?  It's across the street from the Rural Cemetery, and owned in part by the Trustees of Reservations (o...
10/25/2024

See this property? It's across the street from the Rural Cemetery, and owned in part by the Trustees of Reservations (oh, and there's an MWRA easement on it too).

The stunning historic farmhouse that used to be there was offered, FOR FREE, to the town and to the historical society and neither would take it, citing lack of funds to repair. So it was TORN DOWN.

Before that happened I tried to bring it to town meeting to let the people decide - my selectboard colleagues declined to even ask the town's opinion. (One of those people is now against CPA, as he was against the rail trail, against a donation of wetland property, and against literally anything for the public good).

VOTE YES ON QUESTION 6 - VOTE FOR THE CPA

10/17/2024
This is a state senate campaign post, but it's going here on my old local page too.Campaigns are supposed to post smilin...
10/10/2024

This is a state senate campaign post, but it's going here on my old local page too.

Campaigns are supposed to post smiling photos at local events, greeting voters.

This is not that post.

This is me, on my ladder, removing an unapproved sign from a Verizon-owned utility pole in the summer of 2021.

You might be asking yourself, why share this? Because politics can be an ugly business. Because apparently there is a sanctioned attempt to discredit me and my reputation by any means. My opponent's campaign has already tried - unsuccessfully and ironically - to file a campaign finance violation against me. Now they want to try to have charges pressed against me over a three-year-old removal of an illegal sign.

Look - if you're going to vote against me for state senate because you disagree with me on real issues that affect our daily lives - well, I am sorry to have not earned your support, but you have my respect for going to the polls and exercising your right to VOTE.

But - I refuse to let trumped-up stories that twist facts just to rage-bait be the reason.

Still reading?

I was a member of the Rutland Tricentennial town committee, and was in charge of the banner program. We had voted as a group what was allowable on the banners. Understandably, not only would no profanity be allowed, but any political messaging would also be rejected. The tricentennial year was meant to be a family-friendly community builder, not create division.

I designed every one of the banners myself, as applications and payment to the town committee came in from businesses, nonprofits and families, and I sent them to our printer. I ordered the hardware. Several local businesses donated hours of their time, over several days, to install the banners for the town. The banners stretched up and down Main Street and Maple Avenue.

The sign in the photo had been previously submitted to the Committee, and the requester (a committee member themselves) was told directly that it could not be approved, as per the committee's own application rules. I would add here that it took a lot of work to get approval from Verizon for the town to even be able to put up these banners, and this one was going to jeopardize that approval, which came with Verizon's own requirements about content.

After months of our banners being up, with great success, the requester privately ordered, privately paid for, and privately installed the denied banner, removing the existing family banner that had been up for weeks, all without town permission of any kind.

I did not know about this until, as the known town contact for the town banner program, I started to receive a lot of messages and calls. It was a Sunday evening, and I decided to remove it myself. That is my ladder. The others in the photo only stopped when they saw me because they were concerned for my safety, which I do appreciate.

The rest of the people who stopped or slowed did so only to take photos and video. One person who stopped was very belligerent, called the police, and called for me to be arrested. Our good Rutland Police officers who responded deescalated the situation, noting the only person who could press charges was the owner of the sign, and took it. I want to say here, and I hope all of our officers know this, how much I value and appreciate our RPD, our chief, and the good community police department he has cultivated. They always had my unequivocal support while I was elected, and they have it now.

Someone who's been trolling me online argued that the banner should have been removed "by the town". Perhaps. But "the town" hadn't installed any of them - volunteers did. And it was a Sunday evening. Should I have called 911, asked for the town ladder truck to be deployed? Called the hardworking contractor on a Sunday evening, who had volunteered his time previously, to scramble a bucket truck? I was still officially a member of the town committee, I was still the banner program contact.

I had a conversation with the person directly involved after this happened, who ironically was no longer a Rutland resident even when they had the illegal sign installed. The person apologized, said they would not press charges. I offered to pay back the cost of the sign, since I was not able to remove it in a single piece. My offer was declined at the time, but if this person would now like the money for it, I would still be happy to pay. (Though it feels a bit like reimbursing a graffitist for their spray paint.)

The sign was put up without permission. Thousands of people drive on Rutland's Main Street every single day. And if it had said something against any current or former politician, against the police, or quite frankly anything else hateful, I WOULD HAVE DONE THE SAME THING. Anyone who knows me, knows this to be true. Not one more person was going to drive by, seeing that sign and *thinking the town was responsible for it*.

In an attempt to incite anger, incite rage, incite hate, someone came up with this story to try to convince you that I am against free speech. That because I removed an illegal sign, I am going to take someone's personal flag from their personal property. And if I am going to steal someone's flag from their property, I'm also going to take their guns. It's ludicrous.

This entire story, that seems to be making the rounds right now, has been dragged up from 3+ years ago, just to try to upset people. Well - I am still upset about it too. The person involved and I had worked really well together on local issues - for years. We got stuff done. And for the most part, we agreed on the method of getting there. We left national politics at the door - they were irrelevant to what we were dealing with in front of us, our *Rutland* issues.

People keep asking me for a quick soundbyte on why I'm running. Because stuff like this divisive, useless, time-wasting story is exactly why we aren't getting things done for us in Boston right now. Because this district deserves someone with integrity, someone who actually cares about our real local issues, and who is focused on working towards getting real results.

I am so happy to see Rutland finally work to pass Community Preservation Act at the ballot this November.   And I want t...
09/30/2024

I am so happy to see Rutland finally work to pass Community Preservation Act at the ballot this November. And I want to start with - THIS IS NOT A TAX. Let me repeat, THIS IS NOT A TAX.

This is us, as a community, deciding to put a little extra away for big projects that benefit us - and the state matching what we put away. *The only relationship to our taxes is that we use them to do our math*.

My best explanation here is that, for the past 20+ years since this program has been offered, we were like a kid whose grandpa told them he'd match any money we saved...but we stamped our feet and refused to do it. So all his match money has been going to our cousins in other towns.

Let's fix this. Vote YES on CPA in November. (it will be Question 6, last question on the back of your ballot).

Let's talk exemptions!

Exemptions are important because they help to alleviate the financial burden for all of our residents. Some residents will qualify for an exemption where they do not have to pay the surcharge at all. All residents, however, will benefit from the $100,000 exemption. This means that the surcharge would be calculated based off of your property value, less $100,000.

At the Annual Town Meeting in May 2024, the voters adopted the following (3) exemptions:

1. For property owned and occupied, as a domicile, by a person who would qualify for low-income housing; or

2. For property owned and occupied, as a domicile, by a person who would qualify for low or moderate income senior housing; or

3. For $100,000 of the value of each taxable parcel of residential real property;

Those persons who qualify under exemptions (1) & (2) would NOT have to pay the annual surcharge. Please refer to the photo below to determine if your household would qualify for these exemptions.

Have questions? Ask below or e-mail us at [email protected]. 😊

Good morning all, I notice this page has lately gotten a lot of new views.  I appreciate anyone and everyone who is taki...
09/19/2024

Good morning all, I notice this page has lately gotten a lot of new views.

I appreciate anyone and everyone who is taking the time to research their state senate candidates, and I welcome questions and comments about my record as a Selectboard member in Rutland for 13 years. It's a record I'm proud of, and am happy to discuss it with anyone who appreciates delving into the nitty-gritty of municipal government.

For most of my years on the Rutland BoS, my car had a sticker on it that said Local Government Builds Strong Communities - that is the photo at the top of this page. (just gave that car up, with 314k mi on it).

I believe in that statement, and I am looking forward to being an effective advocate at the state level for the 22 diverse, amazing and strong communities that make up the Worcester and Hampshire Senate District.

You are also welcome to join my other social media here:

Website: www.DibbforMASenate.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DibbforMASenate/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dibbformasenate/
Twitter/X: https://x.com/DibbforMASenate

The Worcester & Hampshire Senate District (redistricted in 2021) is a seat that Democrats held (until last November) for 50 years. Why? It's not because our voters are complacent. It's because Democrats are there for all the people they represent, not just for special interests. Our communities,

05/13/2024

Good morning Rutland friends, it's your neighborhood lost-an-election-by-one-contested-overvote former select board member.

It's election day, and the polls have just opened.

Go. Vote. For. ONLY Leah Henry Whiteman, and only Leah, for Selectboard, and Brett Beardmore for WRSD. And the firetruck.

You may ask, why only Leah when the ballot says I can vote for 2? Here's some reasons:

1. You don't have to vote for 2.
2. Leah showed up to both the Candidates' Night and Town Meeting (unlike 2 of the 3 other candidates)
3. Leah isn't running for personal gain.
4. Leah has never suggested that she could just take care of serious HR concerns by herself.
5. Leah has never suggested that she would design our town's sewer system by herself.
6. Leah did not give false information on the town meeting floor about the CPA and its effect on future tax rates (which is, in fact, no effect).
7. Leah is in FAVOR of supporting professional town staff.
8. Leah did not engage in vile rumor-milling about her opponents (I have zero tolerance for what has been going on).
Bottom line - it's important to keep Leah on this board to ensure our town continues to move forward, not backwards.

Out of the other 3 candidates - frankly, they all come with risks, including a real risk of putting the town in a position of getting sued for something. As long as Leah remains on the board, the risk is mitigated.

You may ask, why Brett?
1. Brett has shown himself to be a thoughtful, caring, intelligent school committee member who is focused on the good of our schools and students in general and Rutland in particular.
Unlike his opponent:
2. Brett never had signs up around town that said, "Make Wachusett Great Again". (where are those signs this time around, I wonder).
3. Brett never suggested that schools have pornographic books in them that the parents aren't allowed to know about or read.
4. Brett never suggested (unlike his opponent) that the public health isn't important and that childhood vaccines should not have to be mandatory to protect both our at-risk students and our healthy ones.

5. Brett never brought up, unsolicited, the mask mandate that occurred four years ago during the worldwide covid epidemic.

Brett is not anti-science, anti-teacher, anti-public health, and does not have a creepy fixation on other children's gender identity. Brett will work for the town to make our district better, and not for some vile extremist set of conspiracy-theory shock value issues.

We need people on these boards who work for us, not for themselves.

GO VOTE. Bring your neighbors. Every vote counts.

05/11/2024



If you are on the fence about attending town meeting tonite, please attend. Every article is important, here I will highlight 2:

1. The school budget: *Despite* cuts from the state, the town CAN make the budget work this year. And we are in a strong growth and correction mode under this new superintendent, whose team has reconciled over 3 years of messy financials this year alone - and been transparent during the process. Of course there are still things that need to get better - there always are. We need to give him time to not just put out lots of old fires, but to set this district up for strength, resiliency, and longterm success for our students. A strong education system correlates to strong property values - having good schools is good for us all.
YES on all school budget articles.

2. Community Preservation Act: Even if you're not 100% on board with this (YET - give me a chance and I'll convince you that you should be) : this step in the process is Just To Get It Onto A Future Ballot. You have time to learn more.
YES on sending CPA on to ballot.

TL;DR:
--It's not a tax rate increase.
--It's a surcharge on an existing tax bill, and it's not even the whole bill. (3% after a reduction, plus some owners are exempt...under $125/yr for a $375k value house).
--It's MATCHED BY THE STATE (which means you've already been contributing to it indirectly anyway, with the money going to other towns, congrats!)
--Towns that adopted it years ago have funded HUNDREDS of projects with the money - some theirs...some YOURS (again, your state tax dollars).
--It lets the town save for special projects for open space, recreation, affordable housing.
--It's like a kid's savings account where their grandmother said they'd match what was in it for something the kid really wants/needs. We're the town that's been refusing, for 20 years, to set up the savings account in the first place.

Address

Rutland, MA
01543

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Sheila Dibb, Rutland Selectboard 2007-2020 posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Sheila Dibb, Rutland Selectboard 2007-2020:

Share