California Applicants' Attorneys Association

California Applicants' Attorneys Association Since 1966, the California Applicants’ Attorneys Association has dedicated itself to helping Californians that get hurt on the job heal and get back to work.

When you get hurt on the job, you need medical care and a way to pay bills until you can heal and get back to work. So state government created Workers’ Compensation in order for you to “apply” for benefits that you’re already entitled to and that your employer already paid for. But the slow-moving, inefficient, and complex state bureaucracy cheats employers out of what they paid for, rewards shad

y insurers, and empowers anonymous out-of-state physicians to reject your company-doctor’s orders. The system is failing Californians. Women are subjected to gender bias. Latinos are killed and injured more than others. Asians are blocked by language barriers. And African Americans are denied because of genetics.

The debate over the future of California’s Subsequent Injuries Benefit Trust Fund (SIBTF) continued this past week as AB...
06/22/2026

The debate over the future of California’s Subsequent Injuries Benefit Trust Fund (SIBTF) continued this past week as AB 1576, authored by Assemblymember Liz Ortega, passed the Senate Committee on Labor, Public Employment and Retirement on a 4-1 vote. The measure now advances to the Senate Committee on Appropriations. The bill arrives amid ongoing discussions about the long-term sustainability of the SIBTF, a program designed to provide benefits to workers who suffer a subsequent industrial injury that, when combined with a preexisting disability, results in significant permanent disability.

At the same time, Governor Gavin Newsom’s Administration is pursuing a separate effort to overhaul the SIBTF through a budget trailer bill, citing rising program costs and an increase in the number of claims. Many stakeholders have argued that such significant policy changes should not be enacted through the budget process, which limits public input and legislative scrutiny. Assemblymember Ortega echoed those concerns in the committee hearing on Wednesday, stating that “reforms of this magnitude should be done transparently, thoughtfully, and through the proper legislative process.” For most, the Legislature remains the appropriate venue for evaluating proposed reforms, weighing competing interests, and ensuring that any changes are fully vetted through the committee process.

Stakeholders remain concerned that a proposal advanced through the budget process could retroactively impact thousands of injured workers whose SIBTF claims are currently pending and ready for adjudication. Workers who relied on existing law when pursuing their claims should not face the loss or reduction of benefits due to changes enacted after their cases were filed. Any discussion regarding the future of the SIBTF should preserve due process and ensure that reforms are applied prospectively rather than to claims already moving through the system. As AB 1576 continues through the legislative process, the debate underscores the importance of transparency, and legislative deliberation when considering changes that could affect California’s most seriously disabled workers.

Today, we commemorate Juneteenth, a day marking the end of slavery in the United States and celebrating the pursuit of f...
06/19/2026

Today, we commemorate Juneteenth, a day marking the end of slavery in the United States and celebrating the pursuit of freedom, equality, and justice. As advocates for injured workers, CAAA recognizes the importance of protecting the rights and dignity of all working people and reflects on the progress made and the work that remains. Happy Juneteenth.

California Lawmakers Consider Revisions to Professional Athlete ClaimsCalifornia lawmakers are considering legislation t...
06/15/2026

California Lawmakers Consider Revisions to Professional Athlete Claims

California lawmakers are considering legislation that would restrict workers’ compensation rights for professional athletes. Senate Bill 795, introduced by Senator Laura Richardson, would narrow the circumstances under which professional athletes can pursue cumulative trauma claims in California. Owners of professional sports teams in California characterize the proposal as a refinement of existing law, but the players’ association (NFLPA) argue that it would further erode protections for workers whose careers routinely expose them to repetitive physical trauma and long-term occupational injuries.

Current law, established through AB 1309 in 2013, requires professional athletes seeking cumulative trauma benefits to demonstrate that they spent at least 20 percent of their duty days in California during the final 365 days of employment with the employer against whom the claim is filed. SB 795 would alter that standard by measuring the 20 percent threshold against the final 365 days of an athlete’s entire professional career. Additionally, the bill seeks to rewrite LC3600.5 in an overall attempt to further restrict California workers’ compensation jurisdiction for professional athletes, one such example of that is athletes who spent substantial portions of their careers competing and sustaining injuries in California could lose access to the state's workers’ compensation system because they finished their careers with an out-of-state team.

One aspect of the proposed legislation that has drawn particular attention is how it will be applied to active and pending claims. According to the NFLPA, SB 795 would apply not only to future claims but also to active and pending cases still moving through California’s workers’ compensation system. The players’ union maintains that athletes who filed claims under the existing legal framework could see their eligibility affected if the bill becomes law before those cases are finalized.

The NFLPA has opposed the measure, asserting that professional athletes should not face additional hurdles and barriers to accessing workers compensation benefits. The union has been joined by both the National Hockey League Players’ Association and the Major League Soccer Players Association in opposing the bill. As SB 795 moves through the legislative process, stakeholders will continue to monitor the proposal and its potential effect on the availability of workers’ compensation benefits for professional athletes.

Join us as we kick off Summer Convention with Litigating Home Healthcare Issues at the WCAB. Hear from experienced pract...
06/11/2026

Join us as we kick off Summer Convention with Litigating Home Healthcare Issues at the WCAB. Hear from experienced practitioners as they discuss how to build substantial medical evidence supporting home healthcare, the continuing impact of Rodriguez on treatment requests, and key developments affecting reimbursement rates for home nursing. Whether you represent applicants, defendants, or claims professionals, this session will provide valuable guidance for handling these increasingly complex cases.

Panelists:
Dane Gilliam, Esq. (moderator)
James Umholtz, Esq.
Dr. Brendan Morley
Hon. Barry Gorelick

If you haven't registered for convention yet, make sure you secure your spot today: https://www.caaa.org/?pg=events&evAction=showDetail&eid=322568

The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments on June 2 in Mayor v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Ross Valley...
06/08/2026

The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments on June 2 in Mayor v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Ross Valley Sanitation District) (Supreme Court Case No. S287261), a closely watched case that could have significant implications for how workers’ compensation cases are administered throughout California. At issue is whether the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) retains authority to act on petitions for reconsideration after the statutory 60-day period set forth in former Labor Code section 5909, particularly when administrative delays prevent the Board from receiving or processing a petition within that timeframe.

The dispute stems from a March 2023 award of permanent total disability benefits to an injured worker. After the employer filed a petition for reconsideration, the WCAB ultimately granted reconsideration in August 2023, explaining that an administrative irregularity had delayed receipt of the petition and prevented action within the statutory period. The First District Court of Appeal later concluded that the WCAB lacked jurisdiction to act outside the 60-day deadline, relying on its earlier decision in Zurich American Insurance Co. v. WCAB (2023) 97 Cal.App.5th 1213. (Note: While this case was pending, the California Legislature amended Labor Code Section 5909 so that the 60-day countdown now begins when the case file is transmitted to the Appeals Board rather than when the petition is filed, though this does not directly alter the outcome of the Mayor dispute.)

As is often the case, the court gave no indication of how it will ultimately rule, though some observers viewed portions of the argument as favorable to the petitioner, Joseph Mayor. The case was submitted following argument, and a decision is expected in the coming months. Regardless of how the Court will ultimately rule, Mayor is likely to become one of the most consequential workers’ compensation procedural decisions in recent years, shaping how reconsideration petitions are handled and defining the balance between statutory deadlines and due process protections. The California Applicants’ Attorneys Association will continue to closely monitor developments and provide updates as the Supreme Court issues its ruling.

Join us for the Marvin Shapiro Memorial: Most Important Cases review at our upcoming June convention, featuring an all-s...
06/04/2026

Join us for the Marvin Shapiro Memorial: Most Important Cases review at our upcoming June convention, featuring an all-star panel.

Get up to speed on the latest cases shaping your practice—from psychiatric injury trends, AOE/COE, good faith personnel and intoxication defenses, UR timelines, and LC § 4664 apportionment.
A fast-paced, and sought-after practical update you won’t want to miss.

Panelists:
William Herreras, Esq. (moderator)
Jamie Berenson, Esq.
Andrew Lockard, Esq.
Marguerite Sweeney, Esq.
Beatriz Trejo, Esq.
Colleen Casey, Ret. WC

Convention is just three weeks away! Secure your spot today: https://www.caaa.org/?pg=events&evAction=showDetail&eid=322568

Labor Tensions Rise Ahead of World Cup Matches in Los AngelesIn just 10 days, Los Angeles will play host to one of the w...
06/02/2026

Labor Tensions Rise Ahead of World Cup Matches in Los Angeles

In just 10 days, Los Angeles will play host to one of the world’s biggest sporting spectacles as the 2026 FIFA World Cup arrives at SoFi Stadium. But ahead of the opening matches, concerns over federal immigration enforcement have sparked labor tensions at SoFi Stadium. Hospitality workers, represented by UNITE HERE Local 11, have threatened to strike if Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents are deployed during tournament events. The stadium is scheduled to host eight World Cup matches this summer, including the opening match for the United States national team against Paraguay on June 12.

Workers described the potential presence of ICE agents as creating a climate of fear for both employees and attendees. Many of the workers involved in concessions, hospitality, and stadium operations are immigrants or come from immigrant families, and concerns intensified following reports of aggressive immigration enforcement actions in cities across the country. UNITE HERE 11 escalated their workers concerns in a letter to California Attorney General Rob Bonta alleging that FIFA’s accreditation process, which requires workers to submit personal information before receiving authorization to work could potentially expose employees to targeting by ICE. In addition to demanding assurances ICE agents will not be permitted at World Cup venues, the letter also calls for restrictions on subcontracted labor at the stadium and raised concerns about the potential use of artificial intelligence and automation that could eliminate union jobs during major sporting events.

In response to the concerns brought by the UNITE HERE local 11, organizing officials have clarified that ICE is not part of the official security plan for matches at SoFi Stadium or the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. Kathryn Schloessman, CEO of the Los Angeles World Cup 2026 Host Committee, stated that while local, state, and federal agencies are coordinating on public safety logistics, there is “no indication” that ICE agents will be deployed at major World Cup events in Los Angeles. The clarification has appeared to ease some immediate concerns, though union leaders have continued to call for formal guarantees.

Unfortunately other venues for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, such as New York, New Jersey, and Seattle, are continuing to face the threat of ICE agents being used as part of the security plan. Human Rights Watch has urged FIFA to push for an "ICE Truce" at the World Cup, including assurances that ICE will not conduct immigration arrests at match venues.

The situation highlights the growing intersection between workplace rights, labor protections, and immigration-related fear in industries heavily reliant on immigrant labor. Even outside traditional workers’ compensation disputes, the threat of immigration enforcement can discourage workers from reporting injuries, unsafe conditions, wage violations, or retaliation. The dispute surrounding the World Cup also serves as another reminder that large-scale events and high-profile employers are not immune from broader labor tensions impacting vulnerable workers across California.

To recognize Mental Health Awareness Month CAAA is sharing this timely article with permission By D. Diann Cohen, Vice P...
05/26/2026

To recognize Mental Health Awareness Month CAAA is sharing this timely article with permission By D. Diann Cohen, Vice President of Client Services and Dean of Education at Macro-Pro, Inc.

Mental health conversations are finally becoming more open in both our personal lives and the workplace. That is a good thing. For far too long, mental health struggles were hidden, misunderstood, or treated separately from overall wellness.

As a mother, this subject is deeply personal to me. My son struggled for years with alcoholism, drug addiction, and significant mental health challenges. Like many families facing similar situations, there were difficult days filled with fear, uncertainty, and heartbreak. Watching someone you love battle addiction and emotional pain can make you feel helpless. But there is also hope. Today, my son has been clean and sober for more than eight years. His mental health improved dramatically once he removed alcohol and drugs from his life. One of the biggest turning points in his recovery was when he no longer needed psychiatric medications and could begin rebuilding his life with clarity, stability, and purpose.

What I learned through that journey is something I believe directly applies to claims and workers’ compensation, disability management, and return-to-work discussions: Mental health recovery is rarely about one single solution. It is about rebuilding the whole person. The workplace often focuses on diagnoses, restrictions, medications, and timelines. Those things matter. But real recovery also involves sleep, nutrition, movement, social connection, routine, stress reduction, and purpose.

A recent presentation titled “30 Days to Move the Needle — Deep Dive” by Justin Goodman highlighted several evidence-based lifestyle strategies shown to improve mental wellness, including proper sleep, walking, reducing processed foods, gratitude practices, social connection, nervous system regulation, and addressing nutritional deficiencies. None of these are miracle cures. But together, they create a foundation for resilience. That matters in claims that involve injuries.

When someone is injured, they are often dealing with far more than physical pain. Many experience fear, financial stress, disrupted sleep, anxiety, depression, isolation, or even substance dependency tied to the injury itself. The longer someone remains disconnected from normal routines, work, social interaction, and movement, the harder recovery can become. At the same time, mental health claims introduce another sensitive issue that claims professionals, attorneys, employers, and copy services frequently navigate — medical privacy. In California, mental health records receive some of the strongest privacy protections in the country. Unlike ordinary medical records, psychiatric and psychotherapy records are protected under both federal HIPAA regulations and California’s Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA), along with California Evidence Code protections surrounding the psychotherapist-patient privilege.

In most situations, these records cannot simply be requested because a claim exists. A properly executed authorization signed by the patient is generally required before release. However, there are situations where mental health records may become discoverable during litigation. Under California Evidence Code §1016, when an injured worker places their mental or emotional condition directly at issue in a claim, certain protections may be partially waived. This can occur in psychiatric injury claims, stress-related claims, emotional distress allegations, or when someone claims they cannot work because of a psychological condition. Even then, discoverability is not unlimited.

California courts typically attempt to balance the need for relevant information against the individual’s constitutional right to privacy. Courts often narrow disclosure to records directly related to the conditions being claimed, particularly because psychotherapy notes and therapist communications receive heightened protection under California law. That balance matters. People should never feel that seeking mental health treatment automatically means every deeply personal conversation will become public. Protecting confidential treatment relationships encourages people to seek care earlier, remain engaged in treatment, and stabilize more successfully. At the same time, when psychological conditions are being affirmatively claimed as part of litigation, there are legitimate circumstances where certain records become relevant to evaluating causation, treatment, disability, apportionment, and return-to-work considerations. These are sensitive issues that require thoughtful handling by all parties involved.

Returning an injured worker to work is not simply about reducing indemnity exposure or closing a file. It is about restoring structure, confidence, dignity, purpose, and human connection. Work itself can become part of recovery. Of course, every situation is different. Some individuals require counseling, medications, structured treatment programs, or long-term psychiatric care. Serious mental health conditions should always be evaluated and treated by qualified professionals. Lifestyle strategies are not replacements for appropriate medical care.

But I believe our industry has an opportunity to think more holistically. What if recovery discussions included sleep hygiene? What if walking programs, nutrition education, and social engagement were encouraged alongside treatment plans? What if we recognized that isolation and inactivity can worsen emotional distress? What if return-to-work programs were viewed not only as cost containment tools, but as pathways back to emotional wellness and stability?

As someone who has witnessed recovery firsthand within my own family, I can say this with confidence: People can recover. People can rebuild. People can regain purpose. And sometimes the smallest daily habits become the first steps toward getting their lives back. That is not just good for claims outcomes. It is good for people.

If you are planning on registering for the CAAA's 2026 Summer Convention do so today and save $, early bird pricing ends...
05/22/2026

If you are planning on registering for the CAAA's 2026 Summer Convention do so today and save $, early bird pricing ends tonight at midnight!

Join us at the renowned Omni La Costa Resort & Spa - nestled just north of San Diego in picturesque Carlsbad. Experience California’s foremost workers’ compensation convention, offering an unparalleled opportunity for connection and growth. Network with industry peers, gain invaluable insights, and leave with renewed inspiration, fortified relationships, and a steadfast commitment to advocate for injured workers.

To Register, visit: https://www.caaa.org/?pg=events&evAction=showDetail&eid=322568

Sign up today for CAAA's Summer Convention, before early bird pricing ends in 3 days!: https://www.caaa.org/?pg=events&e...
05/19/2026

Sign up today for CAAA's Summer Convention, before early bird pricing ends in 3 days!: https://www.caaa.org/?pg=events&evAction=showDetail&eid=322568

Also take early peak at one of our featured panels:

Elliot Berkowitz Back to Basics: Medical School for Lawyers

Navigating medical records, diagnostic reports, and clinical terminology can be one of the most daunting challenges attorneys face in practice. In this Back to Basics panel, attorney Robert Mack, Esq. is joined by three medical professionals to bridge the gap between the examining room and the courtroom. The panelists will demystify the medical jargon attorneys encounter daily, with a focused discussion on the most common injuries and diagnoses seen in clinical practice. They will also break down the terminology found in diagnostic test results, making it accessible not just for attorneys, but for the clients they serve. Attendees will leave with a stronger command of medical language and the confidence to discuss complex medical issues clearly and effectively with their clients.

Panelists:
Robert Mack, Esq. (moderator)
Dr. Ryan Derby
Dr. Matthew Johnson
Dr. Yolanta Petrofsky

Address

1303 J Street, Suite 420
Sacramento, CA
95814

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+19164445155

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when California Applicants' Attorneys Association posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to California Applicants' Attorneys Association:

Share