07/03/2026
Dent County Times
July 3, 2026
Dent County Times Sends Flock Camera Questionnaire to Both Presiding Commissioner Candidates
By Osborn Nash
For months, the use of Flock Safety automated license plate recognition (ALPR) cameras has been a topic of discussion throughout Dent County and neighboring communities. The issue has generated conversations regarding public safety, privacy, constitutional rights, government surveillance, and the role of emerging technology in local government.
In an effort to provide voters with accurate information before the August election, Dent County Times distributed an identical questionnaire to both Republican candidates for Dent County Presiding Commissioner, Denver Ellis and A.J. Seay. The questionnaire asked each candidate to explain his position on the current Flock camera program, whether it should continue or expand, concerns regarding privacy and civil liberties, and what policies, if any, should govern the use of this technology.
Both candidates were provided the same questionnaire and the same opportunity to respond.
As of the publication of this article on July 3, 2026, Dent County Times has received a completed questionnaire from candidate Denver Ellis. At the time this article was finalized for publication, no response had been received from candidate A.J. Seay.
To ensure fairness and provide readers with the information available by the publication deadline, Dent County Times is publishing the response that was received. The complete response submitted by Denver Ellis follows below.
Candidate Response â Denver Ellis
Dent County Times Questionnaire: Flock Safety Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Cameras
1. What is your overall position on the use of Flock Safety automated license plate recognition (ALPR) cameras in Dent County?
I oppose the use of Flock Safety automated license plate recognition (ALPR) cameras in Dent County. I strongly support law enforcement and appreciate the difficult job our officers perform every day. At the same time, I believe it is equally important to protect the constitutional rights, privacy, and civil liberties of every resident of Dent County. The Constitution protects all people, and I believe our local government has a responsibility to respect those rights while pursuing public safety.
2. If elected, would you support continuing the current Flock camera program? Why or why not?
NO. If elected, I would not support continuing the current Flock camera program. I believe surveillance technology that has the ability to monitor or record the movements of the public should be used only with the highest level of transparency, accountability, and public confidence. Based on what I have heard from many citizens and my own concerns regarding privacy and individual liberty, I do not believe the current program should continue.
3. If elected, would you support expanding the number of Flock cameras in Dent County? Please explain.
NO. I would oppose any expansion of the current system. Before government expands surveillance technology, there should be compelling justification, complete transparency, and meaningful public input. I do not believe expanding this program is in the best interest of Dent County.
4. What concerns, if any, do you have regarding privacy, civil liberties, or government surveillance related to ALPR technology?
My greatest concern is the long-term expansion of government surveillance. As technology continues to evolve, I believe it is important to carefully evaluate not only what these systems are capable of today, but also what capabilities they could potentially incorporate in the future. If technologies such as Bluetooth detection, RFID reading, or other forms of data collection were ever integrated into these types of systems, it would only strengthen my opposition. My goal would be to prevent further expansion of surveillance technology in Dent County and to work toward eliminating the current Flock camera program.
5. Do you believe there should be policies governing data retention, data sharing, and public oversight of information collected through Flock cameras? If so, what policies would you support?
Absolutely. Any government technology that collects information about the public should be subject to strict written policies governing data retention, access, sharing, auditing, and oversight. Citizens deserve to know what information is collected, who has access to it, how long it is retained, and how it is protected from misuse.
6. Is there anything else you would like Dent County voters to know regarding your position on Flock cameras or similar surveillance technology?
As we celebrate the 250th anniversary of the United States of America this Fourth of July, I cannot help but reflect on the principles upon which our nation was founded. In my opinion, our Founding Fathers would have been deeply concerned by the level of government surveillance that modern technology can make possible. I believe they intended a government that protects the liberties of its people while remaining accountable to themânot one that routinely monitors the daily movements of its citizens without broad public support.
For 250 years, generations of Americans have sacrificed, fought, and, in many cases, given their lives to preserve the freedoms secured by our Constitution. I do not believe those sacrifices were made so that future generations would accept ever-expanding surveillance as the norm.
If elected as Presiding Commissioner, I will work to protect the constitutional rights, privacy, and civil liberties of every resident of Dent County. I will continue supporting our law enforcement officers while advocating for policies that respect both public safety and the individual freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. My position is clear: I oppose the continued use and expansion of Flock cameras in Dent County, and I will work toward bringing the current program to an end.