04/22/2026
Meeting follow-up.
Thank you to everyone who attended the meeting, those who spoke, and those who emailed. The city was inundated with emails! Yay!
I wasn't able to attend but I listened to it virtually and spoke to someone who attended.
The bottom line is that at this point the Mayor and at least one council member are in support of leaving the park the way it is now. They plan to revisit the issue after they get some data on how many children actually use the park as a cut-through to and from the school and how many police and animal control incidents have been reported. After the city gathers that information they will decide if the proposal warrants another meeting.
It might be a good idea to have people follow up with an email with mention of a few things that caught my attention such as:
1. There was mention of neighborhoods surrounding the park wanting to use it as a short cut. Other than school kids, I have never seen that. Even so, there are signs that say you are entering an off-leash dog park so expect to enounter dogs running off leash. Use park at your own risk.
2. There was mention that a precedent has been set for changing how the park is used since it was converted from a soccer park to a dog park. It should be noted that the reason for that one time conversion was because King County closed the park and it became a place used for prostitution, drug dealing, and the homeless. Dog park volunteers are the ones who cleaned all that up and have kept it safe for the entire area surrounding the park for the last 20+ years.
3. This proposed walkway would be primarily for the children in the apartments next to the park. Putting in a walkway for those children would be doing it primarily for private access. There is a federal ordinance that states the grounds cannot be used for anything other than public open space (can't be built upon or privately used). Putting in a walkway for the apartments violates that federal ordinance.
4. There seems to be some confusion as to whether or not the south entrance to the park would be closed to park users. It was mentioned that park users would still be able to use it, as well as the children. This doesn't solve any issues and in fact, creates more. Even if a new seperate walkway was put in on Grandview grounds (as was mentioned) the children would still have to go through a busy parking lot with cars and dogs coming and going, and down the street into the park.
Bottom line, it is a dog park, and never intended to be a public access walkway for anyone.
Let's keep these issues in the minds of the city so this proposal and the objections to it do not get pushed aside. The objections to this issue are too important to be forgotten.
Please email:
The whole council and the Mayor at:
[email protected]