04/13/2026
Some of you may know that I was appointed to the Advisory Task Force on Open Meetings Laws. Its core purpose is to review South Dakota’s open meetings statutes—often called “Sunshine Laws”—and recommend changes that make state and local government more transparent, responsive, and accountable to the public.
A number of the task force’s recommendations were enacted into law this year following our meeting late last year. Several additional proposals are currently being developed and will be introduced during the 2027 legislative session, with the hope that many of them will also become law.
The task force met again this past Tuesday morning. I wanted to update you on a couple of the more significant reforms we discussed.
One proposal that received media attention was the requirement for public bodies to audio-record their official meetings. While the current version of that bill did not pass (see item #8 in the link below), I am optimistic it will move forward at our next meeting in a few months.
There was a thorough discussion about the language, and several technical issues still need to be clarified and refined. However, a strong consensus emerged that all counties — regardless of population — should be required to audio-record their meetings. In addition, most members supported extending the requirement to cities with populations above approx. 1,500 to 2,000. I expect this proposal to pass at our next meeting after we make some targeted improvements to the language.
Article: https://www.siouxfallslive.com/news/south-dakota/task-force-tables-recording-requirement-for-local-governments
Article: https://www.keloland.com/news/capitol-news-bureau/task-force-wants-changes-to-states-open-meeting-laws/
I also brought forward my own proposal (No. 10), which would require public bodies to allow members of the public to comment on each individual agenda item before the body discusses or votes on it.
While the proposal did not pass in its original form, the task force voted unanimously in favor of an amended version that requires a period for public comment at the beginning of every official meeting. Although this is a more modest step than I originally proposed, it is still meaningful progress and a step in the right direction!
Task Force Agenda:https://atg.sd.gov/docs/2026-04-07%20Agenda%20PROPOSED.pdf