https://www.facebook.com/111387347068481/

Kristi Morris - Representative, 59 Coolidge Road, Springfield, VT (2026)

06/02/2026

Legislative Week in Review
May 29, 2026

The 2026 Legislative session ended in spectacular fashion last Friday. With the educational transformation, state budget and the school spending Yield bills all in play on the last day. It is kind of cool to see how each played out following negotiations between the two chambers and the administration. All three were in Committee of Conferences to create a final version to be voted by both chambers. No amendments are allowed prior to the vote. Fortunately, the threats of budget veto and required forced mergers went away and were replaced by compromise and voluntary district mergers. The results were truly an impressive process, as legislation should be. The level of bipartisan and administrative compromise, at the eleventh hour, was much appreciated. This enabled the legislature to adjourn by 7:30 PM, when we were estimated to have gone late into the evening. Adjournment was originally thought to happen around 1:30 in the morning.

I would advise the readers that no bill is perfect, not all parties get their preferences, and the legislation is considered to benefit the most for Vermonters at the time. Of course, this is a matter of perception by individual readers. There is an enormous number of hours that go into creating these bills by taking witness and agency testimony, hearing various amendments, caucus presentations and informational meetings to get to the final version. The budget will have an adjustment amendment, and various reports on the effects of the education bill will be returned in January. The educational bill is expected to have revisions over the next one to three years as the components become reality. Because of process timing and requirement to have legislation completed before adjournment, these bills have to be rolled out. It is expected that the interpretations of legislation will drive further amendments before they are finalized.

The education bill, for example, is expected to be fully in effect by 2029 for the 2030 budget year. Districts will need to review future budgets and expenses before considering the possibility of merging. If done to quickly, voters will not have time to understand the legislation, the potential effects nor have time to provide input.

We had a ceremony at a local restaurant recently, to honor those that have announced they will not be returning next year. This past week, the Speaker announced she will not seek reelection and my Environment Committee Chair also announced she is not running. Some believe that we should have term limits. I believe we need a balance of legislators that have experience and others that are new. To understand protocol and the process, experience is necessary.

Many constituents have contacted me during the session on specific bills. I have heard from both pro and con relative to several of the controversial bills. I have fully appreciated the voters for affording me the opportunity to serve Springfield. As reported last week, I will be running for another term in the Vermont House of Representatives.

We are witnessing much political divisiveness both locally and nationally. Some legislators have received personal threats and the leaders of the majority parties issued a joint statement denouncing harmful statements. The State House adjusted to a single point-of-entry, this year that is controlled by security and has a metal detector and scanner for bag checks. Vermont is not used to this level of security, and I have come to believe this is the new normal in the world of politics. When I ran for office, I thought the world was in a good place and I wanted to be part of the process. Having been involved with manufacturing and various product processes, I entered into the representative race. I believed it would be easier than where we are now, and I am willing to work with all parties. I have fully appreciated the voters for affording me the opportunity to serve Springfield. As reported last week, I will be running for another term in the Vermont House of Representatives.

If you have any questions, comments, concerns or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at home by calling 802-885-2949. My legislative email is [email protected] or my personal email is [email protected]

Representative Kristi Morris

05/25/2026

Legislative Week in Review
May 22, 2026

Your Vermont Legislature is in overtime, as we approach the end of session. Typically, sessions are finished by mid-May. We still have several key bills in play that have consumed a large number of hours this spring. Educational transformation is by far the leading driver for our time. The “Big Bill” state budget is still in play along with the “Yield Bill.” These bills, and others, are interdependent upon the other. The budget can not be finalized until others are completed. Think of it as a puzzle that needs individual pieces put together before it can be completed. Each piece is interconnected with others to finish the puzzle. Because of the must pass bills, many others were delayed pending available time afforded to work on them. Committees and legislative counsel can only work on a handful of bills at any one time. The good news is, we were able to finish a large number of bills last week and the session is closer to winding down. We expect this week will be the last.

Our legislative leadership has been communicating with the Administration, and Senate, to find common ground for negotiating compromise with the larger bills that remain in play. Many other bills have entered into a Committee of Conference to find compromise between the House and Senate. Several of the CoC bills have found their way back to the floor of each chamber for an up or down vote.

I traveled out of town the past two weekends and was not able to put forth a weekly article. We traveled to Pennsylvania for a grandson’s college graduation and a Shriners function last weekend at Jay Peak resort. The good news with that is, many of the bills remained open over the two weeks with several amendments being offered. To summarize, there has not been a large amount of new information to report to the readers. Last week, we were in a mode of hurry up and wait, with floor action mixed with several recesses to enable various committees to take testimony on offered amendments. We experienced several days with floor sessions going into the early evening before we could adjourn for the day. This is typical and usual at the end of each biennium, as legislators strive to have their opinions heard on specific points within a particular bill.

As this biennium ends, the next step is to plan for the 2026 primary and general elections. I have submitted my signature petition and paperwork and announced my intentions to run again as your Representative in Montpelier in the next biennium. With specific bills, it is my belief to first cause no harm to Vermonters with legislation. We have many topics that effect Vermonters. Education costs, healthcare costs, housing and infrastructure replacement that all impact property taxes. I collaborated with many other legislators and committees to offer my opinion on various bills. As drafted, I found it hard to support several, but after amendments soften the impact, I found them more toward my liking in support of my constituents and I was able to vote in support. Each session, bills can contain good ideas. However, they require work to compromise, negotiate and collaborate to find an agreeable result. I know disagreements exist, but it is my opinion that Vermonter’s are better off this year than they were last year through the efforts of the 2026 legislature. Remember, it will be a year or two before bills take effect, and most legislators agree that no bill is perfect. There is strength in a 150-member House, two separate chambers and Administration. Collaboration and compromise of differing opinions can make for a better bill, but perfection is a perception by the individual.

If you have any questions, comments, concerns or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at home by calling 802-885-2949. My legislative email is [email protected] or my personal email is [email protected]

Representative Kristi Morris

05/04/2026

Legislative Week in Review
May 1, 2026

Last week my Environment Committee voted out the S.325 amendment to repeal the “Road Rule” and “Tier 3” sections of Act 181. It passed on a unanimous vote of 11 – 0. Likewise, the Ways & Means Committee passed it out on a 10 – 0 – 1 vote. It will be on the House floor this week. It is expected to pass in response to the large number of Vermont land owners who messaged asking for the repeal. The original bill stood up the Land Use Review Board (LURB), which was then charged with creating the rules to define the road rule and Tier 3 areas. The rules have not been created yet and S.325 will repeal that requirement. Unfortunately, the LURB created and released a premature draft map of their interpretation of the area to be included. It is my opinion that this is what caused the conflict with Vermont land owners concerned they would lose freedom to develop their properties.

Some have called for the repeal of Act 181 in its entirety. If the entire Act is repealed, development permits would revert back to the current Act 250 laws. We have heard, and taken much testimony that Act 250 has caused angst for some developers, and coupled with other permits, can cause delays and expense for development. Also, without the LURB, we would return to the single member Natural Resource Board having just the Director. Additionally, the District Coordinators, and District Commissions, would return to their interpretation of Act 250 criteria. We have heard many complaints about current Act 250 decisions. Act 181 stands up the five member LURB and charges them with educating and coordinating with the districts to provide like and consistent approaches to permit decisions throughout Vermont. Act 181 would remove the duplicate permitting requirement from the process should municipalities have zoning bylaws and staff to administer the permits. The so-called Tier 1 area designations will likely disappear and governing municipalities will issue development permits providing they have adequate staffing. The goal is to reduce costs for development and enable housing to be built more easily in areas where water and wastewater infrastructure is available.

The Educational Transformation Bill H.955 will pass out of the Senate with amendments. This bill will come back to the House and likely will have a Committee of Conference assigned to negotiate a compromise between the House and Senate. The Governor continues to threaten to not sign the budget, “The Big Bill”, should education transformation not meet his expectations. Coupled with the “Yield Bill”, that pays for education, all three will likely see CoC’s. We have been advised that a compromise means neither chamber will end up with what they passed out. As previously reported, there is not a wide range of support for H.955. It passed out of the House on a vote of 79 -62. The Senate version does allocate the entire $105M reserves to buy down property taxes. The House version split the reserves into two years to help stabilize property taxes. Like last year, I supported returning all the reserves back to the taxpayers to reduce property taxes.

The Governor is also advocating for forced mergers of school districts. H.955 makes consolidation voluntary by each community. This puts the consolidation efforts directly on the wishes of each community. Mergers are advertised as a prerequisite to reducing the cost of education. Though this is a possibility, there are some that believe any savings will only be temporary if we do not address the cost drivers of education. Additionally, school construction will need to be considered and would add to the overall cost.

Springfields school budget revote is happening this Tuesday, May 5th. I hope voters came out in large numbers to provide Springfield with a larger number of voter opinions. Thanks to all those that made the effort to vote and thank you to all voting yes.

Thanks to all who came out in support of Green Up Day. I can only hope everyone will recognize, and applaud the efforts and refrain from disposing of trash on our roadsides, trails, parking lots and other areas outside of trash containers. It takes very little effort to retain trash inside your vehicles until arriving home or an area that has receptacles.

If you have any questions, comments, concerns or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at home by calling 802-885-2949. My legislative email is [email protected] or my personal email is [email protected]

Representative Kristi Morris

04/28/2026

Legislative Week in Review
April 24, 2026

Last week my Environment Committee worked to amend S.325. This bill will repeal the Act 181 road rule and the Tier 3 natural resource areas and mapping. Within the original bill, the Land Use Review Board (LURB) was charged with standing up the rules to define Tier 3. Since the LURB was created late in 2025, and because they have an enormous amount of work to complete, they are behind in the rule making. We heard from hundreds of Vermonters who opposed Tier 3 and reached out expressing their opposition. With the partial repeal, the so-called Tier 1 areas are proposed to remain in effect, as several projects are under consideration or under way for housing development in downtown districts, village centers or neighborhood development areas. I anticipate this bill passing out of committee this week. With the biennium winding down the committee chairs of Environment and Senate Natural Resources have discussed the changes in anticipation of it being passed out of the House within the next week or two. With the enormous number of emails and messages received from Vermonters to repeal these sections, we have listened. It is a bipartisan effort contributing to the S.325 amendments and I anticipate it will pass out of the House. If not, Act 181 will remain in effect.

H.955, the Educational Transformation bill is in the Senate Education Committee for their review. As previously reported, there is not a wide range of support for this bill, as it passed out of the House on a vote of 79 -62. The bill contains enough controversy that most everyone is not happy with the results. It divides the state into seven district administrations and relies on voluntary school mergers for any consolidation. The foundation formula for school funding is still a year out at the least. The formula establishes what the state will pay to each district per student. There will be much more to report on within the next couple of weeks as this bill progresses. The Senate is expected to make revisions that will have to come back to the House for concurrence, or a Committee of Conference will be created to negotiate a compromise.

My article last week caused a large amount of controversy. At the request of the Lieutenant Governor, we met to explain each of our opinions of Act 181’s intentions. It was a good meeting and we agreed on some of the components and that it became very political. I also communicated with several other legislator's asked me of my position. Though not all agreed, they were understanding of my explanation. I mentioned in my previous article that Act 181 became political and most of those I talked with agreed. Coming from a selectboard approach, we don’t have party affiliation and the Montpelier experience can take one out of a comfort zone. Act 181 became a very political bill.

Another bill that passed out of the House was S.89. This Senate bill will provide a death benefit to family survivors from a line of duty death for law enforcement personnel, department of correction and DCF employees. The bill adds these employees to a similar benefit that is provided for firefighters. The House had a similar bill that I was advocating for that was not taken up. The Senate did and it is now headed to the Governor. The bill provides an $80K benefit to the family for the designated employees who experience a LODD. We all hope it never happens.

This coming weekend is Vermont’s traditional Green Up Day. Many within our community will support this event by coming out in large numbers to volunteer. There are several local agencies whose members participate annually for this event sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce. The more people that volunteer will help make the task easier and shorten the day for all. If you are around this coming Saturday May 2nd, think about coming down to lend a hand. Collection bags will be available at the Coop parking lot Saturday morning. I am always impressed with the number of green bags lining the road post pickup and the large pile that grows in the Coop parking lot following the volunteers returning their collections

The school budget revote will be May 5th. I hope voters will get out to fill in the ovals with their vote. Regardless of your opinion, please get out and vote. A small turnout is not beneficial to our community would provide a minimum understanding of the community’s intentions. If that day is not a good day for you to get out to vote, you can visit the Town Hall and vote absentee. Since I am in Montpelier on May 5th, I have already voted and it was all of less than 10-minutes. We need to hear from you.

If you have any questions, comments, concerns, or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at home by calling 802-885-2949. My legislative email is [email protected] or my personal email is [email protected]

Representative Kristi Morris

04/19/2026

Legislative Week in Review
April 17, 2026

Like last week, I will focus on two bills that are in process and have had significant controversy. In order to incentivize housing, in our downtown districts, village centers and neighborhood development areas, Act 181 proposes to drop the state Act 250 duplicative permitting process. This is providing municipalities have zoning, water and/or wastewater infrastructure, or potable soils. This incentive applies only to proposed Tier 1 areas. These areas would need to have properties available for in-fill development and would occur in areas where housing already exists. There has been little controversy relative to these areas and dropping duplicative permitting is what developers have been asking for years.

Regarding Tier 3, the following is taken directly from Act 181 and describes the process the Land Use Review Board, the LURB, was supposed to follow. Please read carefully to uunderstand that the preliminary release of maps, by the LURB, was not approved or finalized. The rules surrounding the map development have not been created yet. Further, these critical natural resource areas are supposed to have regional planning and local input. That hasn’t happened yet.

Sec. 22 TIER 3 RULEMAKING: (a) The Board, in consultation with ANR, shall adopt rules to implement the requirements for the administration of 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3)(A)(xiii) and 10 V.S.A. § 6001(46) and (19) (subdivision). It is the intent of the General Assembly that these rules identify critical natural resources for protection. The Board shall review the definition of Tier 3 area; determine the critical natural resources that shall be included in Tier 3, giving due consideration to river corridors, headwater streams, habitat connectors of statewide significance, riparian areas, class A waters, and natural communities; any additional critical natural resources that should be added to the definition; measures to ensure that no municipality or region is disproportionately impacted by Tier 3 designation that would limit reasonable opportunities for Tier 1 or Tier 2 designations; and how to define the boundaries.

Rules adopted by the Board shall include: (1) any necessary clarifications to how the Tier 3 definition is used in 10 V.S.A. chapter 151, including whether and how subdivisions would be covered under the jurisdiction of Tier 3; (2) any necessary changes to how the jurisdictional trigger should be administered and when jurisdiction should be triggered to protect the functions and values of resources of critical natural resources; (3) the process for how Tier 3 areas will be mapped or identified by the ANR and the Board;

The Governor appointed the four LURB member's and they released the premature and obviously incorrect draft map, without defining the rules for the Tier 3 areas. The Administration, LT Governor, used this preliminary and incorrect information on how it would affect rural property owners. Coupled with the Facebook site Vermont Act 181, a campaign initiated to discredit the legislation and create alarm, this caused all the controversy. Why, you ask? Because they oppose the road rule and want development to occur anywhere and everywhere without regard to Act 250. Be careful thinking Act 250 should also be repealed. Those regulations have kept Vermont as we know it, and most are thankful for it. Imagine any type of development in your neighborhoods, including controversial business types, and leach fields next to your drinking water wells. Oversight is mandatory and necessary to avoid such conflicts. Without Act 250, there is no appeal process.

H.955 bill passed out of the House on Friday. This bill divides the state into seven districts and stands up a process for voluntary consolidation. This bill is not proposing forced mergers. Mergers are intended to be voluntary and would need to be voted on and accepted by each district proposing to merge. Some schools have already merged and others have closed. Each of these was based on local control and a vote by the citizens in that district.

Taxpayers can no longer afford the ever-increasing property taxes. However, transformation is going to change how our districts are managed and if we are going to reduce education costs, consolidation and/or closings will be part of the conversations. No one wants their historical schools to disappear. Continuing on the existing system path will only continue to increase costs.

The Governor is threatening to veto this bill and is advocating for forced mergers. I find it confusing that the Governor opposes Act 181 because he wants local control for development but then opposes local control for school mergers. But then, it is an election year, and he will discredit the legislature anyway he can in an attempt to unseat the democratic party members. I apologize for offending anyone reading this for my political opinion. However, follow the news and see that logic seems to be strained in favor of politics.

If you have any questions, comments, concerns, or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at home by calling 802-885-2949. My legislative email is [email protected] or my personal email is [email protected]

Representative Kristi Morris

04/12/2026

Legislative Week in Review
April 10, 2026

This week, I will focus on two bills that are in process and have much controversy. S.325 is in our Environment Committee and is proposing to delay action with Act 181. This bill proposes to drop the Act 250 permitting requirement for development in an attempt to provide incentive for housing. The Act 250 permits are duplicative should a municipality have zoning in place, water and/or wastewater infrastructure, or potable soils. This incentive applies to Tier 1 areas that are within downtown districts, village centers and neighborhood development areas. Additionally, the areas have existing development or has properties available for in-fill development where housing already exists.

Where the controversy enters is with the Tier 3 areas. These are considered to be critical natural resource areas. Specifically, areas where housing would be difficult to build without compromising sensitive resource areas. These could include very steep slopes, wetlands and swamps, wildlife refuge areas and their connectivity to similar areas. Tier 3 areas are being mapped by regional planning commissions with local input.

Act 181 also created a new Land Use Review Board consisting of the Director and four parttime board members. These new board members were appointed by the Governor and are charged with creating the rules and educating the district commissioners. The LURB posted the Tier 3 areas that incorrectly and prematurely covered a larger portion of lands than what is actually intended. The LURB has since taken down the Tier 3 maps, but the damage is done. The maps being created by the RPC’s are far from complete. I can’t help but think the release of the incorrect maps was calculated. The Governor was not a fan of the new restrictive “road rule” or lack of development in the rural parts of Vermont. Afterall, this is an election year and Governor Scott is advocating for additional democratic legislators to be unseated. I could be wrong with my statement, but he, the Lieutenant Governor, or the Vermont Act 181 social media platform have not made any statements relative to the error. The LURB testified before my Environment Committee a week ago and acknowledged the premature release of the preliminary maps. Unfortunately, they have not made any public comment to that affect.

S.325 is proposing to delay the road rule until 2030 and the Tier 3 rules until 2028. The LURB has requested these proposals because the board was staffed late in 2025 and they are not ready to adopt the rules. My Environment Committee continues to take relative testimony and there are other legislators advocating for repeal of the road rule and Tier 3 areas. I’m sure there will be motions to amend S.325 before it is passed out of the House floor.

The Education Committee H.955 bill has been processed out of committee, forwarded to Ways & Means and the Appropriations Committees. It should be on the House floor within the next week or so. This bill is not proposing to suggest forced mergers. It does outline a smaller number of school districts. Mergers are intended to be voluntary and would need to be voted on and accepted by each district proposing to merge. Some schools have already merged. Some towns have voted whether to close their school, or not and some of those have failed. Towns are passionate for their local schools and don’t want to merge with another district.

Taxpayers can no longer afford the ever-increasing property taxes. However, transformation is going to change how our districts are managed and if we are going to reduce education costs, consolidation and/or closings will be part of the conversations. No one wants their historical schools to disappear. Continuing on the existing system path will only continue to increase costs. This bill has a long way to go before passing. The Governor is threatening to not pass the states budget should education transformation not happen within a time frame he can accept. I expect this will continue to be a political issue, like Act 181, because it is an election year. I apologize for suggesting this is a political issue, but unfortunately, we have all heard these topics being discussed and fingers pointed at a specific party to cast blame.

Spring appears to be upon us. Thank goodness for warmer temperatures as we approach the planting and growing season. I continue to advocate for proper disposal of litter. Roadsides and parking lots are not dumping zones for our trash. Please do not dispose of litter in these areas. Take the effort to transport your trash to the next opportunity to dispose of it properly. I’m sure you have seen the trash alongside our roadways, parking lots and ditches. Take pride in your community and do your part to keep Springfield and Vermont cleaner than what you found it.

If you have any questions, comments, concerns or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at home by calling 802-885-2949. My legislative email is [email protected] or my personal email is [email protected]

Representative Kristi Morris

04/06/2026

Legislative Week in Review
April 3, 2026

Of the legislative work last week, I will focus on two bills that are in process and have legislation to clarify or delay proposed action. In addition, we did pass the 2027 Capitals Budget Adjustment. This bill came out of Corrections & Institutions that Alice Emmons chairs. Her article may report more on this bill, so I will not speak to it widely. It did pass out of her committee with all voting to favor its passage. The Ways & Means and Appropriations Committees also voted it out unanimously. Nearly all the budget adjustments mirror the Governor’s request and the fact it had bipartisan support is a credit to her committee for their review and work to get it passed. It was voted out on the House floor on a unanimous voice vote.

One previous bill, that passed into law, has been the subject of much criticism and my Environment Committee continues to take testimony on a correction bill. S.325 proposes to make temporary corrections to Act 181 that was passed in 2024. That Act provides for housing incentives that would eliminate duplication of Act 250 development permits should a municipality have their won permitting process. This incentive applies to Tier 1 areas that are split into Tier 1A and Tier 1B. These areas generally have water and/or wastewater infrastructure and the municipality has zoning and the staff has the capability to issue the permits necessary. The proposed areas are withing the village centers and neighborhood development areas. Additionally, the areas have existing development or has properties available for in-fill development.

Where the controversy enters is with the Tier 3 areas. These are considered to be ecologically sensitive areas. Specifically, areas where housing would be difficult to build. These could include very steep slopes, wetlands and swamps, wildlife refuge areas and their connectivity to similar areas. Tier 3 areas are being mapped by regional planning commissions and involve public hearings and local government input. Tier 2 areas, which is most of Vermont’s lands would remain unchanged and would go thru the Act 250 permitting process. Hopefully, you can start to see that this is a planning tool for where we want to develop, where we don’t want development with the remainder still going thru Act 250. In all areas, a person can go thru Act 250 for acquiring a development permit.

Why is Act 250 a good idea? Because without it, properties could be developed without regard to neighboring properties or their owners. A septic leach field of one property could affect the neighboring properties drinking water without rules. Act 250 was started in the early 1970’s and signed into law by then Governor Dean Davis. Its goal was to prevent sprawl development all over Vermont. It just does not pertain to housing, but all development. Ski areas were expanding all over the state without regard to the effects to neighbors or municipalities. Secondly, the Interstate highways made travel to Vermont, from other states, more accessible which was bringing in development activities. Act 250 has 10 criteria categories with some divided into sub-criteria totaling 32 criteria. Also included in Act 181, is a restriction on the length of a new development road. They are currently restricted to 800 feet with road plus driveways totaling 2,000 feet. Finally, Act 181 stood up the new Land Use Review Board with four commissioners and a director. Previously, there was a single director under the former Natural Resource Board. Most permits are handled at the local district commissioner level. The following link provides a brief review and is relatively easy to read.https://legislature.vermont.gov/Documents/2026/Workgroups/House%20Environment/Bills/S.325/Witness%20Testimony/S.325~Kirsten%20Sultan~Act%20181%20and%20Act%20250%20Presentation%20~4-1-2026.pdf

S.325 is proposing to delay the road rule until 2030 and the Tier 3 rules until 2028. The LURB has requested these proposals because the board was staffed late in 2025 and they are not ready to propose nor adopt the rules. Unfortunately, the LURB released a preliminary Tier 3 map that incorrectly defined Tier 3 areas. This caused much confusion and is the basis most critics are using for their opinions. I would ask for patience and respect for the board as they work thru the regional planning commission maps and actual Tier 3 properties are defined. To rescind Act 181 would put development back under Act 250 control, which has been voiced as too restrictive.

The second bill that was voted out of the Education Committee is H.955. This bill is also headed to the Ways & Means Committee for their review. This bill has a long way to go before it is voted on the House floor. As it stands right now, I haven’t spoken to many people that are happy with this bill proposing to transform our educational system. A preliminary redistricting map has been released dividing the state into seven districts. We have long heard that property taxpayers can no longer afford the ever-increasing taxes. However, transformation is going to change how our districts are managed and if we are going to reduce education costs, consolidation and/or closings will be part of the conversations. No one wants their historical schools to change. Continuing on the existing system will only cost more and more. It will be several months before this bill passes and in-depth explanations can occur. I’m an optimist, but have some doubts we can achieve our goal.

As spring approaches, I continue to advocate for proper disposal of litter. I’m sure you have seen the trash alongside our roadways, parking lots and ditches. These areas are not appropriate for discarding your waste materials. Please take pride in your community and do your part to keep Springfield and Vermont cleaner than what you found it.

If you have any questions, comments, concerns or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at home by calling 802-885-2949. My legislative email is [email protected] or my personal email is [email protected]

Representative Kristi Morris

Kristi Morris - Representative

06/02/2026

05/25/2026

05/04/2026

04/28/2026

04/19/2026

04/12/2026

04/06/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Organization

Shortcuts

Share

Category