02/14/2026
VIGO COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE RESPONDS TO VIDEO
We have been tagged in and provided a video posted by Illinois Predator Poachers. While we respect the goals of this and similar groups, there are multiple legal and non-legal obligations that prevent us from working with these non-law enforcement groups, often described as vigilante groups. As with many aspects of the law and prosecution, this is not as simple as “just arrest them” or “do better” as we will discuss below.
As many Vigo County citizens are likely aware, there was a time prior to 2024, where the Vigo County Sheriff’s Office (VCSO) and the West Terre Haute Police Department (WTHPD) would, with the Prosecutor’s approval, work with these vigilante groups and assist in these arranged meetings, often resulting in arrests and prosecutions for Child Solicitation. A significant sting operation involving the Vigo County Prosecutor’s Office (VCPO) and the VCSO netted 12 arrests in one weekend in 2023. However, during this time our area law enforcement agencies became aware of one or more groups that had engaged in these investigations locally and done so in a way that was not prosecutable and potentially illegal. And we began exploring the alternatives.
The Terre Haute Police Department (THPD) was not involved in those investigations because they were a part of the Indiana Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force (ICAC). ICAC provides training and resources so law enforcement officers can properly engage in these types of investigations. Because of these bad investigations by outside groups where no prosecution was available, Vigo County Prosecutor Terry Modesitt asked our local law enforcement agencies to devote resources to these Online Solicitation Investigations so that we would have an active local effort to locate, arrest and prosecute those people attempting to meet up and engage in illegal activities with minor children. Both agencies agreed and in 2024, the VCSO and the VCPO joined the THPD and became members of the Indiana ICAC task force.
Being a member of ICAC provides training opportunities and resources for Investigators and Prosecutors involved in these Solicitation cases. THPD and VCSO both assigned detectives to be trained and certified who now actively engage in these investigations. The assigned detectives work closely with the Special Victims Deputy Prosecutor.
As an aside, prior to Prosecutor Modesitt taking office in 2007, there was no deputy prosecutor assigned solely to handle these special victim cases. One of the first actions taken during his first year in office was to request County Council funding for two deputy prosecutors who would be trained in and handle specific types of cases. One handling all cases involving child victim crimes like these. And the other working directly with the Drug Task Force. Both focused positions exist today and are on call 24/7 to assist law enforcement.
As noted in the video, the author is frustrated that our local agencies are part of ICAC. To be a member and receive training, investigative and financial assistance, agencies must agree to certain standards. ICAC Operational and Investigative Standards Section 8.4 prohibits any ICAC agency from collaboration with Vigilantes. It reads “8.4 Members shall not collaborate with Vigilantes. Further Members shall not approve, condone, encourage, or promote Vigilante’s activities.” The document defines “Vigilante” as “a non-Partner activist or activist organization engaged in investigative tactics or other law enforcement-like activities.”
The Indiana Prosecuting Attorney’s Council (IPAC) has also provided guidance regarding these solicitation cases and working with outside groups. One point of guidance states “Items used by the vigilante in his or her investigation should be seized immediately, preserved, and searched. Such items likely will include phones and/or computers. A proper forensics search of such items and the trying/disposing of any case that may result from the matter may take up to months or years. ‘All items seized by any law enforcement agency as a result of an arrest, search warrant, or warrantless search, shall be securely held by the law enforcement agency under the order of the court trying the case...Following the final disposition of the cause at trial level or any other final disposition...property...shall be returned to its rightful owner,’ Indiana Criminal Code §35-33-5-5.” We have not had any of these Vigilante groups provide all of the computers, phones, video recording devices, etc… when contacting local law enforcement. Without the willingness of these groups to do turn over all of these aspects of the investigation, not just an envelope of screenshots and a livestreamed video, we are unable to meet this required legal standard.
IPAC has given further guidance regarding the methods used by these groups and how such methods could violate Prosecutor responsibilities in how we handle our cases. You have heard it said by us many times, we cannot talk about pending cases because it could impact the Defendant’s right to a fair trial. The same concerns arise because of the live streamed videos that accompany these vigilante investigations. “The Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council does not support public shaming of criminal suspects/defendants nor trying cases in the media rather than the courtroom. In fact, prosecutors have an ethical duty to ‘refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused,’ Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.8(f).” Our agreeing to work with groups that we know will engage in these live streamed confrontations would be condoning something that we understand can violate our ethical responsibilities.
Neither law enforcement nor most community members want these perpetrators to avoid being held accountable. But, as in all prosecutions, we must dot every “i” and cross every “t” because the burden is ultimately on law enforcement to make sure that we are not violating someone’s rights and are developing cases where the admissible evidence can prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. We thank our local law enforcement agencies for meeting this challenge that we put before them to devote extra resources to the investigation of these Child Solicitation cases. And we will continue to prosecute the cases they bring to us.
For more information about ICAC, please visit: www.in.gov/isp/icactf/