09/01/2026
Oregon Freedom Amendment Challenges Draft Ballot Title for Failure to Accurately Describe Constitutional Amendment
The Ballot Title Must Be Revised.
“The people of Oregon deserve a ballot title that tells them clearly what they are voting on,” said Kari Goodheart, Chief Petitioner of the Oregon Freedom Amendment.
“The Attorney General's draft uses different lists in the yes and no statements, leaves protected activities out of the yes statement, understates the constitutional rights created by the amendment, and then tells voters that its effect is unclear. That does not provide voters with the clear and consistent information Oregon law requires.”
Goodheart has submitted her objections during the statutory comment period, preserving her right to seek Supreme Court review if the ballot title is certified without adequately addressing these objections. Her written comments expressly preserve those arguments for potential review under ORS 250.085.
The Oregon Freedom Amendment is asking for a ballot title that accurately describes the amendment—not one that leaves Oregon voters to determine for themselves what a “yes” vote actually means.